Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Setzler

dblp:226/6165 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 61% Legged, aerial and field robots · 39%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
hybrid trajectory optimization
0.312018
Design and Analysis of a Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial-Aquatic Vehicle · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.312018
Design and Analysis of a Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial-Aquatic Vehicle · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
fixed-wing UAV
0.112018
Design and Analysis of a Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial-Aquatic Vehicle · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

numerical simulation · 0.3direct hybrid trajectory optimization · 0.3dimensionless analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Design and Analysis of a Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial-Aquatic Vehicle
abstract
In this paper, we describe the design and analysis of a fixed-wing unmanned aerial-aquatic vehicle. Inspired by prior work in aerobatic post-stall maneuvers for fixed-wing vehicles [1], we explore the feasibility of executing a water-to-air transition with a fixed-wing vehicle using almost entirely commercial off-the-shelf components (excluding the fuselage). To do this, we first propose a conceptual design based on observations about the dominant forces and dimensionless analysis. We then further refine this concept by building a design tool based on simplified models to explore the design space. To verify the results of the design tool, we use a higher fidelity model along with a direct hybrid trajectory optimization approach to show via numerical simulation that the water-to-air transition is feasible. Finally, we successfully test our design experimentally by hand-piloting a prototype vehicle through the water-to-air transition and discuss our approach for replacing the human-pilot with closed-loop control.
Joseph L. Moore, Andrew Fein, William Setzler
ICRA3