Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nils Wilde

dblp:226/6412 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3238-8153ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 22% Motion planning and robot control · 22% Efficient and distributed learning · 12%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 89% Approximation and online algorithms · 11%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › navigation planning
informative path planning
1.522025
Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Approximation Algorithms for Robot Tours in Random Fields with Guaranteed Estimation Accuracy · ICRA 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
active regression
0.912025
Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression
0.912025
Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming
0.912025
Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.822020
Learning User Preferences from Corrections on State Lattices · ICRA 2020
Learning User Preferences in Robot Motion Planning Through Interaction · ICRA 2018
Human-robot interaction
preference learning
0.822020
Learning User Preferences from Corrections on State Lattices · ICRA 2020
Learning User Preferences in Robot Motion Planning Through Interaction · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-objective optimization
pareto front approximation
0.812024
Regret-Based Sampling of Pareto Fronts for Multiobjective Robot Planning Problems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.812024
Statistically Distinct Plans for Multiobjective Task Assignment · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024
Robotics › Robot manipulation › learning from demonstration
learning from corrections
0.412020
Learning User Preferences from Corrections on State Lattices · ICRA 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning
0.312018
Learning User Preferences in Robot Motion Planning Through Interaction · ICRA 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot coordination
0.212024
Statistically Distinct Plans for Multiobjective Task Assignment · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.212024
Regret-Based Sampling of Pareto Fronts for Multiobjective Robot Planning Problems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.212023
Approximation Algorithms for Robot Tours in Random Fields with Guaranteed Estimation Accuracy · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse optimization · 1.7mixed integer program · 1.7gaussian process · 1.7multi-objective optimization · 1.5adaptive sampling · 1.5approximation algorithm · 1.3learning from corrections · 0.9scalarized optimization · 0.8regret-based sampling · 0.8greedy weight selection · 0.8state lattices · 0.4interactive ranking · 0.3constraint learning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization
abstract
We study informative path planning for active regression in Gaussian Processes (GP). Here, a resource constrained robot team collects measurements of an unknown function, assumed to be a sample from a GP, with the goal of minimizing the trace of the$M$-weighted expected squared estimation error covariance (where$M$is a positive semidefinite matrix) resulting from the GP posterior mean. While greedy heuristics are a popular solution in the case of length constrained paths, it remains a challenge to computeoptimalsolutions in the discrete setting subject to routing constraints. We show that this challenge is surprisingly easy to circumvent. Using the optimality of the posterior mean for a class of functions of the squared loss yields an exact formulation as a mixed integer program. We demonstrate that this approach finds optimal solutions in a variety of settings in seconds and when terminated early, it finds sub-optimal solutions of higher quality than existing heuristics.
Shamak Dutta, Nils Wilde, Stephen L. Smith 0001
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2024 Regret-Based Sampling of Pareto Fronts for Multiobjective Robot Planning Problems
abstract
Many problems in robotics seek to simultaneously optimize several competing objectives. A conventional approach is to create a single cost function comprised of the weighted sum of the individual objectives. Solutions to this scalarized optimization problem are Pareto optimal solutions to the original multiobjective problem. However, finding an accurate representation of a Pareto front remains an important challenge. Uniformly spaced weights are often inefficient and do not provide error bounds. We address the problem of computing a finite set of weights whose optimal solutions closely approximate the solution of any other weight vector. To this end, we prove fundamental properties of the optimal cost as a function of the weight vector. We propose an algorithm that greedily adds the weight vector least-represented by the current set, and provide bounds on the regret. We extend our method to include suboptimal solvers for the scalarized optimization, and handle stochastic inputs to the planning problem. Finally, we illustrate that the proposed approach significantly outperforms baseline approaches for different robot planning problems with varying numbers of objective functions.
Alexander Botros, Nils Wilde, Armin Sadeghi, Javier Alonso-Mora, Stephen L. Smith 0001
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2024 Statistically Distinct Plans for Multiobjective Task Assignment
abstract
We study the problem of finding statistically distinct plans for stochastic task assignment problems such as online multi-robot pickup and delivery (MRPD) when facing multiple competing objectives. In many real-world settings robot fleets do not only need to fulfil delivery requests, but also have to consider auxiliary objectives such as energy efficiency or avoiding human-centered work spaces. We pose MRPD as a multi-objective optimization problem where the goal is to find MRPD policies that yield different trade-offs between given objectives. There are two main challenges: 1) MRPD is computationally hard, which limits the number of trade-offs that can reasonably be computed, and 2) due to the random task arrivals, one needs to consider statistical variance of the objective values in addition to the average. We present an adaptive sampling algorithm that finds a set of policies which i) are approximately optimal, ii) approximate the set of all optimal solutions, and iii) are statistically distinguishable. We prove completeness and adapt a state-of-the-art MRPD solver to the multi-objective setting for three example objectives. In a series of simulation experiments we demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method compared to baseline approaches and show its robustness in a sensitivity analysis. The approach is general and could be adapted to other multi-objective task assignment and planning problems under uncertainty.
Nils Wilde, Javier Alonso-Mora
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2023 Approximation Algorithms for Robot Tours in Random Fields with Guaranteed Estimation Accuracy
abstract
We study the sample placement and shortest tour problem for robots tasked with mapping environmental phenomena modeled as stationary random fields. The objective is to minimize the resources used (samples or tour length) while guaranteeing estimation accuracy. We give approximation algorithms for both problems in convex environments. These improve previously known results, both in terms of theoretical guarantees and in simulations. In addition, we disprove an existing claim in the literature on a lower bound for a solution to the sample placement problem.
Shamak Dutta, Nils Wilde, Pratap Tokekar, Stephen L. Smith 0001
ICRA2
2022 Error-Bounded Approximation of Pareto Fronts in Robot Planning Problems
Alexander Botros, Armin Sadeghi, Nils Wilde, Javier Alonso-Mora, Stephen L. Smith 0001
WAFR3
2021 Learning Control Sets for Lattice Planners from User Preferences
Alexander Botros, Nils Wilde, Stephen L. Smith 0001
WAFR2
2020 Learning User Preferences from Corrections on State Lattices
abstract
Enabling a broader range of users to efficiently deploy autonomous mobile robots requires intuitive frameworks for specifying a robot's task and behaviour. We present a novel approach using learning from corrections (LfC), where a user is iteratively presented with a solution to a motion planning problem. Users might have preferences about parts of a robot's environment that are suitable for robot traffic or that should be avoided as well as preferences on the control actions a robot can take. The robot is initially unaware of these preferences; thus, we ask the user to provide a correction to the presented path. We assume that the user evaluates paths based on environment and motion features. From a sequence of corrections we learn weights for these features, which are then considered by the motion planner, resulting in future paths that better fit the user's preferences. We prove completeness of our algorithm and demonstrate its performance in simulations. Thereby, we show that the learned preferences yield good results not only for a set of training tasks but also for test tasks, as well as for different types of user behaviour.
Nils Wilde, Dana Kulic, Stephen L. Smith 0001
ICRA1
2020 Active Preference Learning using Maximum Regret
abstract
We study active preference learning as a frame-work for intuitively specifying the behaviour of autonomous robots. A user chooses the preferred behaviour from a set of alternatives, from which the robot learns the user's preferences, modeled as a parameterized cost function. Previous approaches present users with alternatives that minimize the uncertainty over the parameters of the cost function. However, different parameters might lead to the same optimal behaviour; as a consequence the solution space is more structured than the parameter space. We exploit this by proposing a query selection that greedily reduces the maximum error ratio over the solution space. In simulations we demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms other state of the art techniques in both learning efficiency and ease of queries for the user. Finally, we show that evaluating the learning based on the similarities of solutions instead of the similarities of weights allows for better predictions for different scenarios.
Nils Wilde, Dana Kulic, Stephen L. Smith 0001
IROS1
2018 Learning User Preferences in Robot Motion Planning Through Interaction
abstract
In this paper we develop an approach for learning user preferences for complex task specifications through human-robot interaction. We consider the problem of planning robot motion in a known environment, but where a user has specified additional spatial and temporal constraints on allowable robot motions. To illustrate the impact of the user's constraints on performance, we iteratively present users with alternative solutions on an interface. The user provides a ranking of alternate paths, and from this we learn about the importance of different constraints. This allows for an accessible method for specifying complex robot tasks. We present an algorithm that iteratively builds a set of constraints on the relative importance of each user constraint, and prove that with sufficient interaction, the algorithm determines a user-optimal path. We demonstrate the practical performance by simulating realistic material transport scenarios in industrial facilities.
Nils Wilde, Dana Kulic, Stephen L. Smith 0001
ICRA1