Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paula Folkeard

dblp:227/3568 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3109-6730ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech evaluation
speech quality assessment
0.312018
Learning-Based Reference-Free Speech Quality Measures for Hearing Aid Applications · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2018
Accessibility and assistive technology › deaf and hard of hearing technology
hearing aids
0.112018
Learning-Based Reference-Free Speech Quality Measures for Hearing Aid Applications · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector regression · 0.7perceptual linear prediction · 0.7gammatone filterbank · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Towards Clinically Feasible Nonintrusive Quality and Intelligibility Indices for Hearing Aids
abstract
Speech quality and intelligibility are of significant importance during clinical hearing aid (HA) fitting and verification. Validated intrusive objective predictors of intelligibility and quality such as the Hearing Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI) and the Hearing Aid Speech Quality Index (HASQI) have not been widely adopted for implementation within clinically available HA test systems. Recent advances in non-intrusive measures, such as those from Clarity Prediction Challenges (CPCs) and HASA-Net, are also not yet accessible to clinicians. Moreover, most of these advancements rely on datasets from simulated HAs, not the commercial devices used by audiologists. This work aims to develop non-intrusive quality and intelligibility indices using custom databases of noisy speech recorded in a HA test box. Similar to the successful models from previous CPCs, the indices were derived using a novel non-intrusive model leveraging automatic speech recognition and self-supervised learning techniques. The proposed non-intrusive model was trained to predict the intrusive HASPI/HASQI values and later validated against subjective intelligibility data obtained from a group of listeners with hearing loss. The proposed model resulted in strong correlations with HASQI (95.96%) and HASPI (97.59%), and a moderate correlation with the subjective intelligibility scores (76.63%).
Vahid Ashkani Chenarlogh, Paula Folkeard, Vijay Parsa
ICASSP2
2018 Learning-Based Reference-Free Speech Quality Measures for Hearing Aid Applications
abstract
Objective measures of speech quality are highly desirable in benchmarking and monitoring the performance of hearing aids (HAs). Existing HA speech quality indices such as the hearing aid speech quality index (HASQI) are intrusive in that they require a properly time-aligned and frequency-shaped reference signal to predict the quality of HA output. Two new reference-free HA speech quality indices are proposed in this paper, based on a model that amalgamates perceptual linear prediction (PLP), hearing loss (HL) modeling, and machine learning concepts. For the first index, HL-modified PLP coefficients and their statistics were used as the feature set, which was subsequently mapped to the predicted quality scores using support vector regression (SVR). For the second index, HL-impacted gammatone auditory filterbank energies and their second-order statistics constituted the feature set, which was again mapped using SVR. Two databases involving HA recordings were collected and utilized for the evaluation of the robustness and generalizability of the two indices. Experimental results showed that the index based on the gammatone filterbank energies not only correlated well with HA quality ratings by hearing impaired listeners, but also exhibited robust performance across different test conditions and was comparable to the full-reference HASQI performance.
Haniyeh Salehi, David Suelzle, Paula Folkeard, Vijay Parsa
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.3