Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pablo Gallego Cascón

dblp:227/6295 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 87% Wearable and physiological sensing · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › hands-free interaction
hands-free input
0.412019
ChewIt. An Intraoral Interface for Discreet Interactions · CHI 2019
Interaction techniques and input › mobile interaction › wearable device interaction
intraoral interface
0.412019
ChewIt. An Intraoral Interface for Discreet Interactions · CHI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 ChewIt. An Intraoral Interface for Discreet Interactions
abstract
Sensing interfaces relying on head or facial gestures provide effective solutions for hands-free scenarios. Most of these interfaces utilize sensors attached to the face, as well as into the mouth, being either obtrusive or limited in input bandwidth. In this paper, we propose ChewIt -- a novel intraoral input interface. ChewIt resembles an edible object that allows users to perform various hands-free input operations, both simply and discreetly. Our design is informed by a series of studies investigating the implications of shape, size, locations for comfort, discreetness, maneuverability, and obstructiveness. Additionally, we evaluated potential gestures that users could use to interact with such an intraoral interface.
Pablo Gallego Cascón, Denys J. C. Matthies, Sachith Muthukumarana, Suranga Nanayakkara
CHI1