Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Harrington
dblp:227/7462
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 45% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 36% Language models and text generation · 11% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › pre-training and adaptation
pre-training and fine-tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scientific machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
foundation models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Case for Strong Scaling in Deep Learning: Training Large 3D CNNs With Hybrid Parallelism · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2021 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelization strategies
hybrid parallelism |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Case for Strong Scaling in Deep Learning: Training Large 3D CNNs With Hybrid Parallelism · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
scaling behavior |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolutional neural network architecture
3d convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | The Case for Strong Scaling in Deep Learning: Training Large 3D CNNs With Hybrid Parallelism · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | The Case for Strong Scaling in Deep Learning: Training Large 3D CNNs With Hybrid Parallelism · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.3pre-training · 1.3fine-tuning · 1.3spatial parallelism · 1.0hybrid parallelism · 1.0data parallelism · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Efficient Segment-Level Waveform Anomaly Detection for Memory DevicesabstractWith the emergence of big data and advanced technologies, memory devices play an important role. However, there is a lack of efficient approaches for waveform anomaly detection to validate the reliability of memory devices under various operations. In this paper, we propose an efficient segment-level waveform anomaly detection method for memory devices that includes the stages of waveform segmentation and anomaly analysis. Being compatible with general waveform sequences, the proposed method features lightweight computational complexity. During the waveform segmentation stage, we execute downsampled segment collection and downsampled segment pair matching to obtain downsampled segments that are associated with individual operations. During the anomaly analysis stage, we execute ensemble denoising, entrywise alignment, anomaly presence examination through excess kurtosis, and anomaly detection with density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) to predict anomaly locations. Simulation results confirm the outstanding performance of the proposed method in terms of matching accuracy, excess kurtosis measurements, and segment-level anomaly detection. Ching-Lun Tai, Peter Harrington |
ICC | 2 |
| 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer BehaviorabstractPre-trained machine learning (ML) models have shown great performance for a
wide range of applications, in particular in natural language processing (NLP)
and computer vision (CV). Here, we study how pre-training could be used for
scientific machine learning (SciML) applications, specifically in the context of
transfer learning. We study the transfer behavior of these models as (i) the pretrained
model size is scaled, (ii) the downstream training dataset size is scaled,
(iii) the physics parameters are systematically pushed out of distribution, and (iv)
how a single model pre-trained on a mixture of different physics problems can
be adapted to various downstream applications. We find that—when fine-tuned
appropriately—transfer learning can help reach desired accuracy levels with orders
of magnitude fewer downstream examples (across different tasks that can even be
out-of-distribution) than training from scratch, with consistent behaviour across a
wide range of downstream examples. We also find that fine-tuning these models
yields more performance gains as model size increases, compared to training from
scratch on new downstream tasks. These results hold for a broad range of PDE
learning tasks. All in all, our results demonstrate the potential of the “pre-train and
fine-tune” paradigm for SciML problems, demonstrating a path towards building
SciML foundation models. Our code is available as open-source. Shashank Subramanian, Peter Harrington, Kurt Keutzer, Wahid Bhimji, Dmitriy Morozov, Michael W. Mahoney, Amir Gholami |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | The Case for Strong Scaling in Deep Learning: Training Large 3D CNNs With Hybrid ParallelismabstractWe present scalable hybrid-parallel algorithms for training large-scale 3D convolutional neural networks. Deep learning-based emerging scientific workflows often require model training with large, high-dimensional samples, which can make training much more costly and even infeasible due to excessive memory usage. We solve these challenges by extensively applying hybrid parallelism throughout the end-to-end training pipeline, including both computations and I/O. Our hybrid-parallel algorithm extends the standard data parallelism with spatial parallelism, which partitions a single sample in the spatial domain, realizing strong scaling beyond the mini-batch dimension with a larger aggregated memory capacity. We evaluate our proposed training algorithms with two challenging 3D CNNs, CosmoFlow and 3D U-Net. Our comprehensive performance studies show that good weak and strong scaling can be achieved for both networks using up to 2K GPUs. More importantly, we enable training of CosmoFlow with much larger samples than previously possible, realizing an order-of-magnitude improvement in prediction accuracy. Yosuke Oyama, Naoya Maruyama, Nikoli Dryden, Erin McCarthy, Peter Harrington, Jan Balewski, Satoshi Matsuoka, Peter Nugent, Brian Van Essen |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 5 |