Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan Hechtbauer

dblp:227/7882 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › multi-robot localization
cooperative localization
0.312018
Server-Assisted Distributed Cooperative Localization Over Unreliable Communication Links · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed estimation
0.312018
Server-Assisted Distributed Cooperative Localization Over Unreliable Communication Links · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

extended kalman filter · 0.7dead-reckoning · 0.3dead reckoning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Manufacturing Stacks: from Reference Models to Technology Stacks for Digital Manufacturing
abstract
A number of initiatives promote the topic of digital manufacturing, i.e., the adoption of pervasive, fine-grained cyber-physical systems (CPS) and of data-driven optimization techniques within the manufacturing domain, both in order to gain efficiency while running conventional operations and to allow for new production and business models such as mass customization or networked value chains.In this context, we contribute the findings from our experience in pursuing this vision through two projects with different goals (gradual improvement over current operations vs. more ambitious rethink), target maturity of their results (production-grade vs. proof-of-concept pilots), and therefore approaches. Concretely, we first elaborate on the often neglected line-level automation and the importance of making it a first-class citizen in digital manufacturing, especially for transitioning current manufacturing facilities into future scenarios. We describe the approach and reference the specific technologies used for its production deployment on the factory floor at a customer organization. We then introduce the positioning, within a second stack jointly prototyped with partner organizations, of reasoning algorithms. As entry points for added autonomy into manufacturing systems, they pave the way for automatic (re)configuration from high level goals and for error recovery.This contribution provides insights on how to design the next generation of software architectures for manufacturing, and aims to contribute to the transition from early reference architectural models into design blueprints for actual technology stacks.
Mathias Lüdtke, Ludovic Delval, Jonathan Hechtbauer, Mirko Bordignon
ETFA3
2018 Server-Assisted Distributed Cooperative Localization Over Unreliable Communication Links
abstract
We consider the problem of cooperative localization (CL) via interrobot measurements for a team of networked robots with limited on-board resources. We propose a novel algorithm in which each robot localizes itself in a global coordinate frame by local dead reckoning, and opportunistically corrects its pose estimate whenever it receives a relative measurement update message from a server. The computation and storage cost per robot in terms of the size of the team is of order $O(1)$, and the robots are only transmitting information when they are involved in a relative measurement. The server also only needs to compute and transmit update messages when it receives an interrobot measurement. Under perfect communication, our algorithm is an alternative implementation of a joint CL for the team via an extended Kalman filter. However, perfect communication is not a hard constraint. We show that our algorithm is robust to communication failures, with formal guarantees that the updated estimates of the robots receiving the update message are of minimum variance in a first-order approximate sense at that given timestep. We demonstrate the performance of our algorithm in simulation and experiments.
Solmaz S. Kia, Jonathan Hechtbauer, David Gogokhiya, Sonia Martínez
IEEE Trans. Robotics2