Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Reza Abbasi
dblp:228/4510
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 42% Vision and language · 40% Language models and text generation · 18% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › social bias
social bias in vision-language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation · CVPR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deciphering the Role of Representation Disentanglement: Investigating Compositional Generalization in CLIP Models · ECCV (89) 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal representation
vision-language representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deciphering the Role of Representation Disentanglement: Investigating Compositional Generalization in CLIP Models · ECCV (89) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive language-image pretraining · 1.6representation disentanglement · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object RepresentationabstractContrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) models excel in zero-shot classification, yet face challenges in complex multi-object scenarios. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of CLIP’s limitations in these contexts using a specialized dataset, ComCO, designed to evaluate CLIP’s encoders in diverse multi-object scenarios. Our findings reveal significant biases: the text encoder prioritizes first-mentioned objects, and the image encoder favors larger objects. Through retrieval and classification tasks, we quantify these biases across multiple CLIP variants and trace their origins to CLIP’s training process, supported by analyses of the LAION dataset and training progression. Our image-text matching experiments show substantial performance drops when object size or token order changes, underscoring CLIP’s instability with rephrased but semantically similar captions. Extending this to longer captions and text-to-image models like Stable Diffusion, we demonstrate how prompt order influences object prominence in generated images. For more details and access to our dataset and analysis code, visit our project repository: https://clip-oscope.github.io/. Reza Abbasi, Aminreza Sefid, Mohammadali Banayeeanzade, Mohammad H. Rohban, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | GABInsight: Exploring Gender-Activity Binding Bias in Vision-Language ModelsabstractVision-language models (VLMs) are intensively used in many downstream tasks, including those requiring assessments of individuals appearing in the images. While VLMs perform well in simple single-person scenarios, in real-world applications, we often face complex situations in which there are persons of different genders doing different activities. We show that in such cases, VLMs are biased towards identifying the individual with the expected gender (according to ingrained gender stereotypes in the model or other forms of sample selection bias) as the performer of the activity. We refer to this bias in associating an activity with the gender of its actual performer in an image or text as the Gender-Activity Binding (GAB) bias and analyze how this bias is internalized in VLMs. To assess this bias, we have introduced the GAB dataset with approximately 5500 AI-generated images that represent a variety of activities, addressing the scarcity of real-world images for some scenarios. To have extensive quality control, the generated images are evaluated for their diversity, quality, and realism. We have tested 12 renowned pre-trained VLMs on this dataset in the context of text-to-image and image-to-text retrieval to measure the effect of this bias on their predictions. Additionally, we have carried out supplementary experiments to quantify the bias in VLMs’ text encoders and to evaluate VLMs’ capability to recognize activities. Our experiments indicate that VLMs experience an average performance decline of about 13.2% when confronted with gender-activity binding bias. Ali Abdollahi, Mahdi Ghaznavi, Mohammad Reza Karimi Nejad, Arash Mari Oriyad, Reza Abbasi, Ali Salesi, Melika Behjati, Mohammad H. Rohban, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah |
ECAI | 5 |
| 2024 | Deciphering the Role of Representation Disentanglement: Investigating Compositional Generalization in CLIP Models
Reza Abbasi, Mohammad H. Rohban, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah |
ECCV (89) | 1 |