Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tunaggina Subrina Khan

dblp:228/6045 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0009-0005-8469-6053ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 61% Spatial and temporal data management · 30% Data mining · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › crowdsourced data processing
crowd-powered data integration
0.312018
ZIP-Code Classification Using Spatial and Crowdsourced Data · ICDE 2018
Data integration and cleaning
spatial data integration
0.312018
ZIP-Code Classification Using Spatial and Crowdsourced Data · ICDE 2018
Spatial and temporal data management › location data
volunteered geographic information
0.312018
ZIP-Code Classification Using Spatial and Crowdsourced Data · ICDE 2018
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.112018
ZIP-Code Classification Using Spatial and Crowdsourced Data · ICDE 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

naïve bayes classifier · 0.3lazy k-nearest neighbor classifier · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 CrowdZIP: A System to Improve Reverse ZIP Code Geocoding using Spatial and Crowdsourced Data (Demo Paper)
abstract
Zoning Improvement Plan (ZIP) Codes provide a sub-division of space. Interestingly, the ZIP code area polygons for different data sources do not match, resulting in uncertainty for a range of services that rely on such data. This paper presents a system that employs traditional classification methods to map a given spatial coordinate to a distribution of ZIP-codes using various public available ZIP-code maps as predictors, and using the (not publicly available) United States Postal Service (USPS) map as an authoritative ground truth. We show that large sets of microblog data, from which we extract potential ZIP-codes, can significantly improve classification accuracy despite the noise of such data. The demonstrator allows users to select locations on a map of Orlando, FL, view the resulting distribution of ZIP-codes predicted for this location, compare the results to the ground-truth, and view the microblogs that have enriched the result. A focus will be on showing that the signal present in large, noisy, and 99.99% unrelated microblog data can indeed be used to improve reverse ZIP code geo-coding.
Tunaggina Subrina Khan, Anowarul Kabir, Dieter Pfoser, Andreas Züfle
SIGSPATIAL/GIS1
2018 ZIP-Code Classification Using Spatial and Crowdsourced Data
abstract
Zoning Improvement Plan (ZIP) Code polygon maps, obtained from different data sources, do not match, thus creating uncertainty in spatial analysis. In this dissertation, we want to combine multiple source of ZIP-code polygon data into a coherent system that maps a given location to a ZIP-code. For this purpose, we want to harness the wisdom of the crowd by combining various polygon map data sets with various sources of volunteered geographical information. The system that we want to build will employ traditional classification methods to map a given spatial coordinate to a distribution of ZIP-codes using the (not publicly available) United States Postal Service (USPS) map as an authoritative ground truth. In our first studies, we train a Naïve Bayes classifier using multiple (publicly available) ZIP Code polygon maps. In addition, we enrich our classification by using a lazy K-Nearest Neighbor classifier to predict the ZIP Codes for a given location using Twitter. Feeding the result of this classifier to the Naïve Bayes classification our experimental evaluation shows an improvement in classification accuracy, compared to using only map data.
Tunaggina Subrina Khan
ICDE1