Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sara Brin Rosenthal
dblp:228/7783
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
gene interaction network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On entropy and information in gene interaction networks · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
gene set enrichment analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On entropy and information in gene interaction networks · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › network visualization
biological network visualization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Interactive network visualization in Jupyter notebooks: visJS2jupyter · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network
network biology |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Interactive network visualization in Jupyter notebooks: visJS2jupyter · Bioinform. 2018 |
Information theory › information measures › shannon information measures
entropy and mutual information |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | On entropy and information in gene interaction networks · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mutual information · 0.8interaction information · 0.8harmonic oscillator model · 0.8entropy · 0.8network propagation · 0.3interactive visualization · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Mapping the gene network landscape of Alzheimer's disease through integrating genomics and transcriptomicsabstractIntegration of multi-omics data with molecular interaction networks enables elucidation of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Using the latest genome-wide association studies (GWAS) including proxy cases and the STRING interactome, we identified an AD network of 142 risk genes and 646 network-proximal genes, many of which were linked to synaptic functions annotated by mouse knockout data. The proximal genes were confirmed to be enriched in a replication GWAS of autopsy-documented cases. By integrating the AD gene network with transcriptomic data of AD and healthy temporal cortices, we identified 17 gene clusters of pathways, such as up-regulated complement activation and lipid metabolism, down-regulated cholinergic activity, and dysregulated RNA metabolism and proteostasis. The relationships among these pathways were further organized by a hierarchy of the AD network pinpointing major parent nodes in graph structure including endocytosis and immune reaction. Control analyses were performed using transcriptomics from cerebellum and a brain-specific interactome. Further integration with cell-specific RNA sequencing data demonstrated genes in our clusters of immunoregulation and complement activation were highly expressed in microglia. Sara Brin Rosenthal, Hao Wang 0128, Da Shi, Cin Liu, Ruben Abagyan, Linda K. McEvoy, Chi-Hua Chen 0001 |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2019 | On entropy and information in gene interaction networksabstractMOTIVATION: Modern biological experiments often produce candidate lists of genes presumably related to the studied phenotype. One can ask if the gene list as a whole makes sense in the context of existing knowledge: Are the genes in the list reasonably related to each other or do they look like a random assembly? There are also situations when one wants to know if two or more gene sets are closely related. Gene enrichment tests based on counting the number of genes two sets have in common are adequate if we presume that two genes are related only when they are in fact identical. If by related we mean well connected in the interaction network space, we need a new measure of relatedness for gene sets. RESULTS: We derive entropy, interaction information and mutual information for gene sets on interaction networks, starting from a simple phenomenological model of a living cell. Formally, the model describes a set of interacting linear harmonic oscillators in thermal equilibrium. Because the energy function is a quadratic form of the degrees of freedom, entropy and all other derived information quantities can be calculated exactly. We apply these concepts to estimate the probability that genes from several independent genome-wide association studies are not mutually informative; to estimate the probability that two disjoint canonical metabolic pathways are not mutually informative; and to infer relationships among human diseases based on their gene signatures. We show that the present approach is able to predict observationally validated relationships not detectable by gene enrichment methods. The converse is also true; the two methods are therefore complementary. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The functions defined in this paper are available in an R package, gsia, available for download at https://github.com/ucsd-ccbb/gsia. Z. S. Wallace, Sara Brin Rosenthal, Kathleen M. Fisch, Trey Ideker, Roman Sásik |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2019 | Ten simple rules for writing and sharing computational analyses in Jupyter NotebooksabstractAuthor(s): Rule, Adam; Birmingham, Amanda; Zuniga, Cristal; Altintas, Ilkay; Huang, Shih-Cheng; Knight, Rob; Moshiri, Niema; Nguyen, Mai H; Rosenthal, Sara Brin; Pérez, Fernando; Rose, Peter W | Editor(s): Lewitter, Fran Adam Rule, Amanda Birmingham, Cristal Zuñiga, Ilkay Altintas, Shih-Cheng Huang, Rob Knight 0001, Niema Moshiri, Mai H. Nguyen, Sara Brin Rosenthal, Peter W. Rose |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 9 |
| 2018 | Interactive network visualization in Jupyter notebooks: visJS2jupyterabstractMotivation: Network biology is widely used to elucidate mechanisms of disease and biological processes. The ability to interact with biological networks is important for hypothesis generation and to give researchers an intuitive understanding of the data. We present visJS2jupyter, a tool designed to embed interactive networks in Jupyter notebooks to streamline network analysis and to promote reproducible research. Results: The tool provides functions for performing and visualizing useful network operations in biology, including network overlap, network propagation around a focal set of genes, and co-localization of two sets of seed genes. visJS2jupyter uses the JavaScript library vis.js to create interactive networks displayed within Jupyter notebook cells with features including drag, click, hover, and zoom. We demonstrate the functionality of visJS2jupyter applied to a biological question, by creating a network propagation visualization to prioritize risk-related genes in autism. Availability and implementation: The visJS2jupyter package is distributed under the MIT License. The source code, documentation and installation instructions are freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/ucsd-ccbb/visJS2jupyter. The package can be downloaded at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/visJS2jupyter. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Sara Brin Rosenthal, Julia Len, Mikayla Webster, Aaron Gary, Amanda Birmingham, Kathleen M. Fisch |
Bioinform. | 1 |