Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Siyi Hu 0001
dblp:228/8430-1
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3936-3568ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 74% Multi-agent systems · 23% Deep learning architectures and training · 4% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
3.2 | 5 | 2024 | Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024 MARLlib: A Scalable and Efficient Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning Library · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Policy Diagnosis via Measuring Role Diversity in Cooperative Multi-agent RL · ICML 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
cooperative agents |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
heterogeneous agents |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
heterogeneous-agent reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent reasoning
intention inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
maximum entropy reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › actor-critic methods
soft actor-critic |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
trust region methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent coordination
zero-shot coordination |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent environments |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MARLlib: A Scalable and Efficient Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning Library · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
credit assignment |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Policy Diagnosis via Measuring Role Diversity in Cooperative Multi-agent RL · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | UPDeT: Universal Multi-agent RL via Policy Decoupling with Transformers · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
human-AI collaboration |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mirror learning · 1.5sequential update scheme · 0.8probabilistic graphical model · 0.8maximum entropy objective · 0.8large language model · 0.8belief updating · 0.8advantage decomposition · 0.8standardized environment wrapper · 0.7policy mapping · 0.7communication mechanism · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Nucleolus Credit Assignment for Effective Coalitions in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning
Yugu Li, Zehong Cao, Jianglin Qiao, Siyi Hu 0001 |
AAMAS | 4 |
| 2024 | ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language ModelsabstractBuilding agents with adaptive behavior in cooperative tasks stands as a paramount goal in the realm of multi-agent systems. Current approaches to developing cooperative agents rely primarily on learning-based methods, whose policy generalization depends heavily on the diversity of teammates they interact with during the training phase. Such reliance, however, constrains the agents' capacity for strategic adaptation when cooperating with unfamiliar teammates, which becomes a significant challenge in zero-shot coordination scenarios. To address this challenge, we propose ProAgent, a novel framework that harnesses large language models (LLMs) to create proactive agents capable of dynamically adapting their behavior to enhance cooperation with teammates. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. It then updates its beliefs in alignment with the teammates' subsequent actual behaviors. Moreover, ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various of coordination scenarios. Experimental evaluations conducted within the Overcooked-AI environment unveil the remarkable performance superiority of ProAgent, outperforming five methods based on self-play and population-based training when cooperating with AI agents. Furthermore, in partnered with human proxy models, its performance exhibits an average improvement exceeding 10% compared to the current state-of-the-art method. For more information about our project, please visit https://pku-proagent.github.io. Ceyao Zhang, Kaijie Yang, Siyi Hu 0001, Guanghe Li, Yihang Sun, Zhaowei Zhang 0001, Anji Liu, Song-Chun Zhu, Xiaojun Chang, Junge Zhang, Feng Yin 0001, Yitao Liang, Yaodong Yang 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2024 | Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learningabstract*Multi-agent reinforcement learning* (MARL) has been shown effective for cooperative games in recent years. However, existing state-of-the-art methods face challenges related to sample complexity, training instability, and the risk of converging to a suboptimal Nash Equilibrium. In this paper, we propose a unified framework for learning \emph{stochastic} policies to resolve these issues. We embed cooperative MARL problems into probabilistic graphical models, from which we derive the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) objective for MARL. Based on the MaxEnt framework, we propose *Heterogeneous-Agent Soft Actor-Critic* (HASAC) algorithm. Theoretically, we prove the monotonic improvement and convergence to *quantal response equilibrium* (QRE) properties of HASAC. Furthermore, we generalize a unified template for MaxEnt algorithmic design named *Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Mirror Learning* (MEHAML), which provides any induced method with the same guarantees as HASAC. We evaluate HASAC on six benchmarks: Bi-DexHands, Multi-Agent MuJoCo, StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge, Google Research Football, Multi-Agent Particle Environment, and Light Aircraft Game. Results show that HASAC consistently outperforms strong baselines, exhibiting better sample efficiency, robustness, and sufficient exploration. Jiarong Liu, Yifan Zhong, Siyi Hu 0001, Haobo Fu, Qiang Fu 0016, Xiaojun Chang, Yaodong Yang 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement LearningabstractThe necessity for cooperation among intelligent machines has popularised cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) in AI research. However, many research endeavours heavily rely on parameter sharing among agents, which confines them to only homogeneous-agent setting and leads to training instability and lack of convergence guarantees. To achieve effective cooperation in the general heterogeneous-agent setting, we propose Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning (HARL) algorithms that resolve the aforementioned issues. Central to our findings are the multi-agent advantage decomposition lemma and the sequential update scheme. Based on these, we develop the provably correct Heterogeneous-Agent Trust Region Learning (HATRL), and derive HATRPO and HAPPO by tractable approximations. Furthermore, we discover a novel framework named Heterogeneous-Agent Mirror Learning (HAML), which strengthens theoretical guarantees for HATRPO and HAPPO and provides a general template for cooperative MARL algorithmic designs. We prove that all algorithms derived from HAML inherently enjoy monotonic improvement of joint return and convergence to Nash Equilibrium. As its natural outcome, HAML validates more novel algorithms in addition to HATRPO and HAPPO, including HAA2C, HADDPG, and HATD3, which generally outperform their existing MA-counterparts. We comprehensively test HARL algorithms on six challenging benchmarks and demonstrate their superior effectiveness and stability for coordinating heterogeneous agents compared to strong baselines such as MAPPO and QMIX. Yifan Zhong, Jakub Grudzien Kuba, Xidong Feng, Siyi Hu 0001, Jiaming Ji, Yaodong Yang 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2023 | MARLlib: A Scalable and Efficient Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning LibraryabstractA significant challenge facing researchers in the area of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) pertains to the identification of a library that can offer fast and compatible development for multi-agent tasks and algorithm combinations, while obviating the need to consider compatibility issues. In this paper, we present MARLlib, a library designed to address the aforementioned challenge by leveraging three key mechanisms: 1) a standardized multi-agent environment wrapper, 2) an agent-level algorithm implementation, and 3) a flexible policy mapping strategy. By utilizing these mechanisms, MARLlib can effectively disentangle the intertwined nature of the multi-agent task and the learning process of the algorithm, with the ability to automatically alter the training strategy based on the current task's attributes. The MARLlib library's source code is publicly accessible on GitHub: https://github.com/Replicable-MARL/MARLlib. Siyi Hu 0001, Yifan Zhong, Minquan Gao, Weixun Wang, Hao Dong 0003, Xiaodan Liang, Zhihui Li 0001, Xiaojun Chang, Yaodong Yang 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | Policy Diagnosis via Measuring Role Diversity in Cooperative Multi-agent RLabstractCooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is making rapid progress for solving tasks in a grid world and real-world scenarios, in which agents are given different attributes and goals, resulting in different behavior through the whole multi-agent task. In this study, we quantify the agent’s behavior difference and build its relationship with the policy performance via {\bf Role Diversity}, a metric to measure the characteristics of MARL tasks. We define role diversity from three perspectives: action-based, trajectory-based, and contribution-based to fully measure a multi-agent task. Through theoretical analysis, we find that the error bound in MARL can be decomposed into three parts that have a strong relation to the role diversity. The decomposed factors can significantly impact policy optimization in three popular directions including parameter sharing, communication mechanism, and credit assignment. The main experimental platforms are based on {\bf Multiagent Particle Environment (MPE) }and {\bf The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge (SMAC)}. Extensive experiments clearly show that role diversity can serve as a robust measurement for the characteristics of a multi-agent cooperation task and help diagnose whether the policy fits the current multi-agent system for better policy performance. Siyi Hu 0001, Chuanlong Xie, Xiaodan Liang, Xiaojun Chang |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | UPDeT: Universal Multi-agent RL via Policy Decoupling with Transformers
Siyi Hu 0001, Fengda Zhu, Xiaojun Chang, Xiaodan Liang |
ICLR | 1 |