Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neekon Vafa

dblp:229/3981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
1as first author
13since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-0555-4200ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 9 · 1 first-author · 9 since 2021Security and privacy · 5 · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 47% Computational complexity · 40% Mathematical optimization · 10%
Network and information security
6 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 44% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 26% Security and privacy of machine learning · 22%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › verifiable computation
memory checking
2.532025
Memory Checking Requires Logarithmic Overhead · J. ACM 2025
The Complexity of Memory Checking with Covert Security · EUROCRYPT (5) 2025
Memory Checking Requires Logarithmic Overhead · STOC 2024
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction
1.012026
Adaptive Robustness of Hypergrid Johnson-Lindenstrauss · STOC 2026
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction › random projection
johnson-lindenstrauss transform
1.012026
Adaptive Robustness of Hypergrid Johnson-Lindenstrauss · STOC 2026
Algorithms and data structures
metric embedding
1.012026
Adaptive Robustness of Hypergrid Johnson-Lindenstrauss · STOC 2026
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
random projection
1.012026
Adaptive Robustness of Hypergrid Johnson-Lindenstrauss · STOC 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack
backdoor defense
0.912025
Oblivious Defense in ML Models: Backdoor Removal without Detection · STOC 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack › backdoor defense
backdoor removal
0.912025
Oblivious Defense in ML Models: Backdoor Removal without Detection · STOC 2025
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography
0.912025
Post-quantum PKE from Unstructured Noisy Linear Algebraic Assumptions: Beyond LWE and Alekhnovich's LPN · EUROCRYPT (2) 2025
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key encryption
0.912025
Post-quantum PKE from Unstructured Noisy Linear Algebraic Assumptions: Beyond LWE and Alekhnovich's LPN · EUROCRYPT (2) 2025
Computational complexity
lattice problems
0.912025
Symmetric Perceptrons, Number Partitioning and Lattices · STOC 2025
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › subset sum
number partitioning
0.912025
Symmetric Perceptrons, Number Partitioning and Lattices · STOC 2025
Computational complexity
query complexity
0.912025
Memory Checking Requires Logarithmic Overhead · J. ACM 2025
Authentication and access control › access control
integrity protection
0.712023
MacORAMa: Optimal Oblivious RAM with Integrity · CRYPTO (4) 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › oblivious data structures
oblivious RAM
0.712023
MacORAMa: Optimal Oblivious RAM with Integrity · CRYPTO (4) 2023
Computational complexity › average-case complexity
average-case hardness
0.612022
Continuous LWE is as Hard as LWE & Applications to Learning Gaussian Mixtures · FOCS 2022
Computational complexity
learning theory
0.612022
Continuous LWE is as Hard as LWE & Applications to Learning Gaussian Mixtures · FOCS 2022
Computational complexity › lattice problems
learning with errors
0.612022
Continuous LWE is as Hard as LWE & Applications to Learning Gaussian Mixtures · FOCS 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
one-way functions
0.312025
Memory Checking Requires Logarithmic Overhead · J. ACM 2025
Information theory › cryptography
authentication
0.212024
Memory Checking Requires Logarithmic Overhead · STOC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound proof · 1.5symmetric perceptron · 0.9machine learning · 0.9compression arguments · 0.9compression argument · 0.9oblivious RAM · 0.7integrity verification · 0.7sparse secrets · 0.6reduction · 0.6lattice problems · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Adaptive Robustness of Hypergrid Johnson-Lindenstrauss
abstract
Johnson and Lindenstrauss (Contemporary Mathematics, 1984) showed that for n > m, a scaled random projection A from ℝn to ℝm is an approximate isometry on any set S of size at most exponential in m. If S is larger, however, its points can contract arbitrarily under A. In particular, the hypergrid ([−B, B] ∩ ℤ)n is expected to contain a point that is contracted by a factor of κstat = Θ(B)−1/α, where α = m/n.
Andrej Bogdanov, Alon Rosen, Neekon Vafa, Vinod Vaikuntanathan
STOC3
2025 The Complexity of Memory Checking with Covert Security
Elette Boyle, Ilan Komargodski, Neekon Vafa
EUROCRYPT (5)3
2025 Post-quantum PKE from Unstructured Noisy Linear Algebraic Assumptions: Beyond LWE and Alekhnovich's LPN
Riddhi Ghosal, Aayush Jain, Paul Lou, Amit Sahai, Neekon Vafa
EUROCRYPT (2)5
2025 Oblivious Defense in ML Models: Backdoor Removal without Detection
Shafi Goldwasser, Jonathan Shafer, Neekon Vafa, Vinod Vaikuntanathan
STOC3
2025 Symmetric Perceptrons, Number Partitioning and Lattices
Neekon Vafa, Vinod Vaikuntanathan
STOC1
2025 Memory Checking Requires Logarithmic Overhead
abstract
We study the complexity of memory checkers with computational security and prove the first general tight lower bound. Memory checkers, first introduced over 30 years ago by Blum, Evans, Gemmel, Kannan, and Naor (FOCS ’91, Algorithmica ’94), allow a user to store and maintain a large memory on a remote and unreliable server by using small trusted local storage. The user can issue instructions to the server and after every instruction, obtain either the correct value or a failure (but not an incorrect answer) with high probability. The main complexity measure of interest is the size of the local storage and the number of queries the memory checker makes upon every logical instruction. The most efficient known construction has query complexity \(O(\log n/\log \log n)\) and local space proportional to a computational security parameter, assuming one-way functions, where n is the logical memory size. Dwork, Naor, Rothblum, and Vaikuntanathan (TCC ’09) showed that for a restricted class of “deterministic and non-adaptive” memory checkers, this construction is optimal, up to constant factors. However, going beyond the small class of deterministic and non-adaptive constructions has remained a major open problem. In this work, we fully resolve the complexity of memory checkers by showing that any construction with local space p and query complexity q must satisfy \(\begin{equation*} p \ge \frac{n}{(\log n)^{O(q)}} \;. \end{equation*}\) This implies, as a special case, that \(q\ge \Omega (\log n/\log \log n)\) in any scheme, assuming that \(p\le n^{1-\varepsilon }\) for \(\varepsilon \gt 0\) . The bound applies to any scheme with computational security, completeness \(2/3\) , and inverse polynomial in n soundness (all of which make our lower bound only stronger). We further extend the lower bound to schemes where the read complexity \(q_r\) and write complexity \(q_w\) differ. For instance, we show the tight bound that if \(q_r=O(1)\) and \(p\le n^{1-\varepsilon }\) for \(\varepsilon \gt 0\) , then \(q_w\ge n^{\Omega (1)}\) . This is the first lower bound, for any non-trivial class of constructions, showing a read-write query complexity trade-off. Our proof is via a delicate compression argument showing that a “too good to be true” memory checker can be used to compress random bits of information. We draw inspiration from tools recently developed for lower bounds for relaxed locally decodable codes. However, our proof itself significantly departs from these works, necessitated by the differences between settings.
Elette Boyle, Ilan Komargodski, Neekon Vafa
J. ACM3
2024 Memory Checking Requires Logarithmic Overhead
abstract
We study the complexity of memory checkers with computational security and prove the first general tight lower bound.
Elette Boyle, Ilan Komargodski, Neekon Vafa
STOC3
2024 Sparse Linear Regression and Lattice Problems
Aparna Gupte, Neekon Vafa, Vinod Vaikuntanathan
TCC (2)2
2024 Indistinguishability Obfuscation from Bilinear Maps and LPN Variants
Seyoon Ragavan, Neekon Vafa, Vinod Vaikuntanathan
TCC (4)2
2023 MacORAMa: Optimal Oblivious RAM with Integrity
Surya Mathialagan, Neekon Vafa
CRYPTO (4)2
2022 Continuous LWE is as Hard as LWE & Applications to Learning Gaussian Mixtures
abstract
We show direct and conceptually simple reductions between the classical learning with errors (LWE) problem and its continuous analog, CLWE (Bruna, Regev, Song and Tang, STOC 2021). This allows us to bring to bear the powerful machinery of LWE-based cryptography to the applications of CLWE. For example, we obtain the hardness of CLWE under the classical worst-case hardness of the gap shortest vector problem. Previously, this was known only under quantum worst-case hardness of lattice problems. More broadly, with our reductions between the two problems, any future developments to LWE will also apply to CLWE and its downstream applications. As a concrete application, we show an improved hardness result for density estimation for mixtures of Gaussians. In this computational problem, given sample access to a mixture of Gaussians, the goal is to output a function that estimates the density function of the mixture. Under the (plausible and widely believed) exponential hardness of the classical LWE problem, we show that Gaussian mixture density estimation in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ with roughly $\log n$ Gaussian components given poly $(n)$ samples requires time quasi-polynomial in n. Under the (conservative) polynomial hardness of LWE, we show hardness of density estimation for $n^{\epsilon}$ Gaussians for any constant $\epsilon>0$, which improves on Bruna, Regev, Song and Tang (STOC 2021), who show hardness for at least $\sqrt{n}$ Gaussians under polynomial (quantum) hardness assumptions. Our key technical tool is a reduction from classical LWE to LWE with k-sparse secrets where the multiplicative increase in the noise is only $O(\sqrt{k})$, independent of the ambient dimension n.
Aparna Gupte, Neekon Vafa, Vinod Vaikuntanathan
FOCS2
2022 Average-Case Hardness of NP and PH from Worst-Case Fine-Grained Assumptions
Lijie Chen 0001, Shuichi Hirahara, Neekon Vafa
ITCS3
2021 The Non-hardness of Approximating Circuit Size
Eric Allender, Rahul Ilango, Neekon Vafa
Theory Comput. Syst.3