Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ahmed Y. Ahmed

dblp:23/10916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 79% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 10% Design research and methods · 10%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.112012
Supporting traditional music-making: designing for situated discretion · CSCW 2012
Empirical software engineering › qualitative research
ethnographic study
0.112012
Digging in the crates: an ethnographic study of DJS' work · CHI 2012
Design research and methods › field study
ethnographic study
0.012012
Supporting traditional music-making: designing for situated discretion · CSCW 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ethnography · 0.4observation · 0.3interviews · 0.3design implications · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Digging in the crates: an ethnographic study of DJS' work
abstract
An ethnographic study uncovers the work of nightclub DJs, which extends far beyond the act of mixing tracks to also encompass collecting music, preparing for performances, and promotion and networking. We reveal how DJs value vinyl and digital formats in different ways, acquire music through 'crate digging', prepare physical and digital crates of music before gigs, and how these underpin improvised selections during their performances. We document how DJs interact with promoters, venues, dancers and other DJs, revealing an etiquette that governs how they select and share music, and manage an ongoing tension between revealing and hiding metadata so as to maintain a competitive edge. We raise implications for technologies to support DJs, while also shedding light on previous studies of music consumption and sharing in other settings.
Ahmed Y. Ahmed, Steve Benford, Andy Crabtree
CHI1
2012 Supporting traditional music-making: designing for situated discretion
abstract
An ethnographic study of Irish music sessions in pubs elaborates the collaborative work involved in making traditional music. Central to this distinctive achievement is the sequencing of tunes so that they hang together and combine to form discrete "sets", which rely on a shared knowledge of musical repertoires. Our study shows how musicians develop this musical knowledge through the use of digital resources and social networks. It also reveals how musicians construct and make use of various paper props to help bring their knowledge to bear in the actual in vivo course of a session so as to maintain the moral order of making music together in a demonstrably traditional way. The social demands of musical "etiquette" sensitise CSCW to the need to design technologies to support the "situated discretion" that is essential to traditional practices. We elaborate this notion through a discussion of requirements for technologies that bridge between online resources and the collaborative sequencing of tunes during performance.
Steve Benford, Peter Tolmie, Ahmed Y. Ahmed, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden
CSCW3