Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

K. Sundar Das

dblp:23/3067 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 70% Storage systems · 30%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Database system architecture and tuning · 44% Data models and query languages · 44% Indexing and storage engines · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data models and query languages › schema management
database restructuring
0.011976
A Dynamic Database Reorganization Algorithm · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1976
Performance modeling and evaluation
analytical modeling
0.011976
Application of an Analytical Model to Evaluate Storage Structures · SIGMOD Conference 1976
Storage systems › file systems
file reorganization
0.011975
Reorganization Points for File Designs with Nonlinear Processing Costs · VLDB 1975
Indexing and storage engines
file organization
0.011975
Reorganization Points for File Designs with Nonlinear Processing Costs · VLDB 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

heuristic · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1978 An efficient job scheduling algorithm for mixed turnaround and deadline applications
K. Sundar Das, Toby J. Teorey
Inf. Sci.1
1977 Application of an analytical model to evaluate storage structures
Toby J. Teorey, K. Sundar Das
Inf. Sci.2
1976 Application of an Analytical Model to Evaluate Storage Structures
abstract
The File Design Analyzer is a software package which evaluates well-known database storage structures and access methods in terms of secondary storage processing time and storage overhead required to service a set of user applications. It implements a first-order analytical model to specifically evaluate sequential, indexed sequential, direct access, inverted, multilist, and network storage structures. Interaction with the package is available in conversational mode, enabling the experienced analyst to conduct on-line sensitivity analysis.The paper describes three extensions of a conceptual model and system into a practical tool for evaluation of existing or proposed database designs: batched transactions, multi-access interference due to shared secondary storage, and variable record size. Case studies of real systems illustrate the potential of the File Design Analyzer to provide insight regarding the optimal choice of physical parameters within a specified storage structure and to effectively compare alternative storage structures for a particular set of applications.
Toby J. Teorey, K. Sundar Das
SIGMOD Conference2
1976 A Dynamic Database Reorganization Algorithm
abstract
Reorganization is necessary in some databases for overcoming the performance deterioration caused by updates. The paper presents a dynamic reorganization algorithm which makes the reorganization decision by measuring the database search costs. Previously, the reorganization intervals could only be determined for linear deterioration and known database lifetime. It is shown that the dynamic reorganization algorithm is near optimum for constant reorganization cost and is superior for increasing reorganization cost. In addition, it can be applied to cases of unknown database lifetime and nonlinear performance deterioration. The simplicity, generality, and efficiency appear to make this good heuristic for database reorganization.
K. Sundar Das, Toby J. Teorey
ACM Trans. Database Syst.2
1975 Reorganization Points for File Designs with Nonlinear Processing Costs
abstract
An important problem in accessing and updating large scale data bases is the determination of when to reorganize the data and eliminate records that have been flagged for deletion but have not as yet been physically deleted. Such records take up valuable storage space and cause a degradation of access times to the active records, mainly because of the necessity to maintain overflow areas. After a certain length of time it is usually desirable to merge the old data and its overflow areas into a new data base of the original format, thus reallocating the physical storage for maximum efficiency within the constraints imposed by the data base organization. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of various system and user parameters on the choice of optimal reorganization points over a wide range of file organizations and user applications. The analysis of file reorganization is seen as a first step toward understanding large scale data base reorganization.
K. Sundar Das, Toby J. Teorey
VLDB1