Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuan Ye 0001

dblp:23/3416-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
1.022022
Does Recommend-Revise Produce Reliable Annotations? An Analysis on Missing Instances in DocRED · ACL (1) 2022
Integrating Relation Constraints with Neural Relation Extractors · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
document-level relation extraction
0.612022
Does Recommend-Revise Produce Reliable Annotations? An Analysis on Missing Instances in DocRED · ACL (1) 2022
Empirical software engineering
data annotation
0.612022
Does Recommend-Revise Produce Reliable Annotations? An Analysis on Missing Instances in DocRED · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
neural relation extraction
0.412020
Integrating Relation Constraints with Neural Relation Extractors · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distant supervision · 1.1annotation analysis · 1.1neural network · 0.4constraint loss · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Does Recommend-Revise Produce Reliable Annotations? An Analysis on Missing Instances in DocRED
abstract
DocRED is a widely used dataset for documentlevel relation extraction.In the large-scale annotation, a recommend-revise scheme is adopted to reduce the workload.Within this scheme, annotators are provided with candidate relation instances from distant supervision, and they then manually supplement and remove relational facts based on the recommendations.However, when comparing Do-cRED with a subset relabeled from scratch, we find that this scheme results in a considerable amount of false negative samples and an obvious bias towards popular entities and relations.Furthermore, we observe that the models trained on DocRED have low recall on our relabeled dataset and inherit the same bias in the training data.Through the analysis of annotators' behaviors, we figure out the underlying reason for the problems above: the scheme actually discourages annotators from supplementing adequate instances in the revision phase.We appeal to future research to take into consideration the issues with the recommend-revise scheme when designing new models and annotation schemes.The relabeled dataset is released at https://github. com/AndrewZhe/Revisit-DocRED, to serve as a more reliable test set of document RE models.
Quzhe Huang, Shibo Hao, Yuan Ye 0001, Shengqi Zhu 0002, Yansong Feng 0002, Dongyan Zhao 0001
ACL (1)3
2020 Integrating Relation Constraints with Neural Relation Extractors
abstract
Recent years have seen rapid progress in identifying predefined relationship between entity pairs using neural networks (NNs). However, such models often make predictions for each entity pair individually, thus often fail to solve the inconsistency among different predictions, which can be characterized by discrete relation constraints. These constraints are often defined over combinations of entity-relation-entity triples, since there often lack of explicitly well-defined type and cardinality requirements for the relations. In this paper, we propose a unified framework to integrate relation constraints with NNs by introducing a new loss term, Constraint Loss. Particularly, we develop two efficient methods to capture how well the local predictions from multiple instance pairs satisfy the relation constraints. Experiments on both English and Chinese datasets show that our approach can help NNs learn from discrete relation constraints to reduce inconsistency among local predictions, and outperform popular neural relation extraction (NRE) models even enhanced with extra post-processing. Our source code and datasets will be released at https://github.com/PKUYeYuan/Constraint-Loss-AAAI-2020.
Yuan Ye 0001, Yansong Feng 0002, Bingfeng Luo, Yuxuan Lai, Dongyan Zhao 0001
AAAI1
2018 Improved Discourse Parsing with Two-Step Neural Transition-Based Model
abstract
Discourse parsing aims to identify structures and relationships between different discourse units. Most existing approaches analyze a whole discourse at once, which often fails in distinguishing long-span relations and properly representing discourse units. In this article, we propose a novel parsing model to analyze discourse in a two-step fashion with different feature representations to characterize intra sentence and inter sentence discourse structures, respectively. Our model works in a transition-based framework and benefits from a stack long short-term memory neural network model. Experiments on benchmark tree banks show that our method outperforms traditional 1-step parsing methods in both English and Chinese.
Yanyan Jia, Yansong Feng 0002, Yuan Ye 0001, Chongde Shi, Dongyan Zhao 0001
ACM Trans. Asian Low Resour. Lang. Inf. Process.3