Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lorraine Sandford

dblp:23/3767 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 78% Image recognition and object detection · 22%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.021994
Using Geometric Distance Fits for 3-D Object Modeling and Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
On using geometric distance fits to estimate 3D object shape, pose, and deformation from range, CT, and video images · CVPR 1993
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.011994
Using Geometric Distance Fits for 3-D Object Modeling and Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
Geometric modeling and processing
surface fitting
0.011994
Using Geometric Distance Fits for 3-D Object Modeling and Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape reconstruction
0.011993
On using geometric distance fits to estimate 3D object shape, pose, and deformation from range, CT, and video images · CVPR 1993
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › geometric model fitting
surface fitting
0.011993
On using geometric distance fits to estimate 3D object shape, pose, and deformation from range, CT, and video images · CVPR 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constrained optimization · 0.0nonlinear least-squares estimation · 0.0nonlinear least squares · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Using Geometric Distance Fits for 3-D Object Modeling and Recognition
abstract
Addresses the problems of automatically constructing algebraic surface models from sets of 2D and 3D images and using these models in pose computation, motion and deformation estimation, and object recognition. We propose using a combination of constrained optimization and nonlinear least-squares estimation techniques to minimize the mean-squared geometric distance between a set of points or rays and a parameterized surface. In modeling tasks, the unknown parameters are the surface coefficients, while in pose and deformation estimation tasks they represent the transformation which maps the observer's coordinate system onto the modeled surface's own coordinate system. We have applied this approach to a variety of real range, computerized tomography and video images.>
Steve Sullivan, Lorraine Sandford, Jean Ponce
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1993 On using geometric distance fits to estimate 3D object shape, pose, and deformation from range, CT, and video images
abstract
The problems of automatically constructing algebraic surface models from sets of 3D and 2D images and using these models in pose computation, motion and deformation estimation, and object recognition are addressed. It is proposed that a combination of constrained optimization and nonlinear least-squares estimation techniques be used to minimize the mean-squared geometric distance between a set of points or rays and a parameterized surface. In modeling tasks, the unknown parameters are the surface coefficients, while in pose and deformation estimation tasks they represent the transformation mapping the observer's coordinate system onto the modeled surface's own coordinate system. This approach is applied to a variety of real range, computerized tomography (CT), and video images.>
Steve Sullivan, Lorraine Sandford, Jean Ponce
CVPR2