Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruei-Rung Lee
dblp:23/6348
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › boolean function decomposition
bi-decomposition |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Bi-decomposing large Boolean functions via interpolation and satisfiability solving · DAC 2008 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
boolean function decomposition |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Bi-decomposing large Boolean functions via interpolation and satisfiability solving · DAC 2008 |
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Bi-decomposing large Boolean functions via interpolation and satisfiability solving · DAC 2008 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Bi-decomposing large Boolean functions via interpolation and satisfiability solving · DAC 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interpolation · 0.2incremental SAT solving · 0.2BDD · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Bi-decomposing large Boolean functions via interpolation and satisfiability solvingabstractBoolean function bi-decomposition is a fundamental operation in logic synthesis. A function f(X) is bi-decomposable under a variable partition XA,XB,XC on X if it can be written as h(fA(XA,XC),fB(XB, XC)) for some functions h, fA, and fB. The quality of a bi-decomposition is mainly determined by its variable partition. A preferred decomposition is disjoint, i.e. XC = ø, and balanced, i.e. |XA| ã |XB|. Finding such a good decomposition reduces communication and circuit complexity, and yields simple physical design solutions. Prior BDD-based methods may not be scalable to decompose large functions due to the memory explosion problem. Also as decomposability is checked under a fixed variable partition, searching a good or feasible partition may run through costly enumeration that requires separate and independent decomposability checkings. This paper proposes a solution to these difficulties using interpolation and incremental SAT solving. Preliminary experimental results show that the capacity of bi-decomposition can be scaled up substantially to handle large designs. Ruei-Rung Lee, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Wei-Lun Hung |
DAC | 1 |
| 2008 | To SAT or not to SAT: Ashenhurst decomposition in a large scaleabstractFunctional decomposition is a fundamental operation in logic synthesis. Prior BDD-based approaches to functional decomposition suffer from the memory explosion problem and do not scale well to large Boolean functions. Variable partitioning has to be specified a priori and often restricted to a few bound-set variables. Moreover, non-disjoint decomposition requires substantial sophistication. This paper shows that, when Ashenhurst decomposition (the simplest and preferable functional decomposition) is considered, both single-and multiple-output decomposition can be formulated with satisfiability solving, Craig interpolation, and functional dependency. Variable partitioning can be automated and integrated into the decomposition process without the bound-set size restriction. The computation naturally extends to non-disjoint decomposition. Experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively decompose functions with up to 300 input variables. Hsuan-Po Lin, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Ruei-Rung Lee |
ICCAD | 3 |