Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jacob F. Degner
dblp:23/7594
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-4898-8575ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression quantification
allele-specific expression |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
read mapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › transcriptome sequencing
RNA sequencing analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.1read mapping · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Estimating colocalization probability from limited summary statisticsabstractBACKGROUND: Colocalization is a statistical method used in genetics to determine whether the same variant is causal for multiple phenotypes, for example, complex traits and gene expression. It provides stronger mechanistic evidence than shared significance, which can be produced through separate causal variants in linkage disequilibrium. Current colocalization methods require full summary statistics for both traits, limiting their use with the majority of reported GWAS associations (e.g. GWAS Catalog). We propose a new approximation to the popular coloc method that can be applied when limited summary statistics are available. Our method (POint EstiMation of Colocalization, POEMColoc) imputes missing summary statistics for one or both traits using LD structure in a reference panel, and performs colocalization using the imputed summary statistics. RESULTS: We evaluate the performance of POEMColoc using real (UK Biobank phenotypes and GTEx eQTL) and simulated datasets. We show good correlation between posterior probabilities of colocalization computed from imputed and observed datasets and similar accuracy in simulation. We evaluate scenarios that might reduce performance and show that multiple independent causal variants in a region and imputation from a limited subset of typed variants have a larger effect while mismatched ancestry in the reference panel has a modest effect. Further, we find that POEMColoc is a better approximation of coloc when the imputed association statistics are from a well powered study (e.g., relatively larger sample size or effect size). Applying POEMColoc to estimate colocalization of GWAS Catalog entries and GTEx eQTL, we find evidence for colocalization of 150,000 trait-gene-tissue triplets. CONCLUSIONS: We find that colocalization analysis performed with full summary statistics can be closely approximated when only the summary statistics of the top SNP are available for one or both traits. When applied to the full GWAS Catalog and GTEx eQTL, we find that colocalized trait-gene pairs are enriched in tissues relevant to disease etiology and for matches to approved drug mechanisms. POEMColoc R package is available at https://github.com/AbbVie-ComputationalGenomics/POEMColoc . Emily A. King, Fengjiao Dunbar, Justin Wade Davis, Jacob F. Degner |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2009 | Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing dataabstractMOTIVATION: Next-generation sequencing has become an important tool for genome-wide quantification of DNA and RNA. However, a major technical hurdle lies in the need to map short sequence reads back to their correct locations in a reference genome. Here, we investigate the impact of SNP variation on the reliability of read-mapping in the context of detecting allele-specific expression (ASE). RESULTS: We generated 16 million 35 bp reads from mRNA of each of two HapMap Yoruba individuals. When we mapped these reads to the human genome we found that, at heterozygous SNPs, there was a significant bias toward higher mapping rates of the allele in the reference sequence, compared with the alternative allele. Masking known SNP positions in the genome sequence eliminated the reference bias but, surprisingly, did not lead to more reliable results overall. We find that even after masking, approximately 5-10% of SNPs still have an inherent bias toward more effective mapping of one allele. Filtering out inherently biased SNPs removes 40% of the top signals of ASE. The remaining SNPs showing ASE are enriched in genes previously known to harbor cis-regulatory variation or known to show uniparental imprinting. Our results have implications for a variety of applications involving detection of alternate alleles from short-read sequence data. AVAILABILITY: Scripts, written in Perl and R, for simulating short reads, masking SNP variation in a reference genome and analyzing the simulation output are available upon request from JFD. Raw short read data were deposited in GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE18156. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jacob F. Degner, John C. Marioni, Athma A. Pai, Joseph K. Pickrell, Everlyne Nkadori, Yoav Gilad, Jonathan K. Pritchard |
Bioinform. | 1 |