Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick Hollis

dblp:23/7747 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 81% Autonomous driving · 19%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot dynamics
mobile robot dynamics
0.112010
Analysis and Experimental Verification for Dynamic Modeling of A Skid-Steered Wheeled Vehicle · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2010
Robotics › Autonomous driving › behavior prediction
driving behavior prediction
0.012010
Analysis and Experimental Verification for Dynamic Modeling of A Skid-Steered Wheeled Vehicle · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2010
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.012010
Analysis and Experimental Verification for Dynamic Modeling of A Skid-Steered Wheeled Vehicle · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kinematic modeling · 0.1dynamic modeling · 0.1PID control · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Analysis and Experimental Verification for Dynamic Modeling of A Skid-Steered Wheeled Vehicle
abstract
Skid-steered vehicles are often used as outdoor mobile robots due to their robust mechanical structure and high maneuverability. Sliding, along with rolling, is inherent to general curvilinear motion, which makes both kinematic and dynamic modeling difficult. For the purpose of motion planning, this paper develops and experimentally verifies dynamic models of a skid-steered wheeled vehicle for general planar (2-D) motion and for linear 3-D motion. These models are characterized by the coefficient of rolling resistance, the coefficient of friction, and the shear deformation modulus, which have terrain-dependent values. The dynamic models also include motor saturation and motor power limitations, which enable correct prediction of vehicle velocities when traversing on hills. It is shown that the closed-loop system that results from inclusion of the dynamics of the [proportional--integral--derivative (PID)] speed controllers for each set of wheels does a much better job than the open-loop model of predicting the vehicle linear and angular velocities. For a vehicle turning with small linear and angular accelerations, the model provides accurate predictions of velocities and reasonable predictions of torques. Hence, the closed-loop model is recommended for motion planning.
Oscar Chuy, Emmanuel G. Collins Jr., Patrick Hollis
IEEE Trans. Robotics4
2009 Dynamic modeling of a skid-steered wheeled vehicle with experimental verification
abstract
Skid-steered vehicles are often used as outdoor mobile robots due to their robust mechanical structure and high maneuverability. Sliding along with rolling is inherent to general curvilinear motion, which makes both kinematic and dynamic modeling difficult. For the purpose of motion planning this paper develops and experimentally verifies dynamic models of a skid-steered wheeled vehicle for general planar (2D) motion and for linear 3D motion. These models are characterized by the coefficient of rolling resistance, the coefficient of friction, and the shear deformation modulus, which have terrain-dependent values. The dynamic models also include motor saturation and motor power limitations, which enable correct prediction of vehicle velocities when traversing hills. It is shown that the closed-loop system that results from inclusion of the dynamics of the (PID) speed controllers for each set of wheels does a much better job than the open loop model of predicting the vehicle linear and angular velocities. Hence, the closed-loop model is recommended for motion planning.
Oscar Chuy, Emmanuel G. Collins Jr., Patrick Hollis
IROS4