Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rajesh Subbiah

dblp:23/9104 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0003-0738-1259ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Energy-efficient computing · 70% Performance modeling and evaluation · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy-efficient computing
datacenter power management
0.112010
Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers · HPCA 2010
Energy-efficient computing › datacenter power management
server-level power monitoring
0.112010
Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers · HPCA 2010
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.112010
Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers · HPCA 2010
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.012010
Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers · HPCA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical measurement · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 CINET: A cyberinfrastructure for network science
abstract
Networks are an effective abstraction for representing real systems. Consequently, network science is increasingly used in academia and industry to solve problems in many fields. Computations that determine structure properties and dynamical behaviors of networks are useful because they give insights into the characteristics of real systems. We introduce a newly built and deployed cyberinfrastructure for network science (CINET) that performs such computations, with the following features: (i) it offers realistic networks from the literature and various random and deterministic network generators; (ii) it provides many algorithmic modules and measures to study and characterize networks; (iii) it is designed for efficient execution of complex algorithms on distributed high performance computers so that they scale to large networks; and (iv) it is hosted with web interfaces so that those without direct access to high performance computing resources and those who are not computing experts can still reap the system benefits. It is a combination of application design and cyberinfrastructure that makes these features possible. To our knowledge, these capabilities collectively make CINET novel. We describe the system and illustrative use cases, with a focus on the CINET user.
Sherif Elmeligy Abdelhamid, Richard A. Aló, S. M. Arifuzzaman, Pete Beckman, Md Hasanuzzaman Bhuiyan, Keith R. Bisset, Edward A. Fox, Geoffrey C. Fox, Kevin Hall, S. M. Shamimul Hasan, Anurodh Joshi, Maleq Khan, Chris J. Kuhlman, Spencer J. Lee, Jonathan Leidig, Hemanth Makkapati, Madhav V. Marathe, Henning S. Mortveit, Judy Qiu, S. S. Ravi, Zalia Shams, Ongard Sirisaengtaksin, Rajesh Subbiah, Samarth Swarup, Nick Trebon, Anil Vullikanti
eScience23
2010 Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers
abstract
The management of power consumption in datacenters has become an important problem. This needs a systematic evaluation of the as-is scenario to identify potential areas for improvement and quantify the impact of any strategy. We present a measurement study of a production datacenter from a joint perspective of power and performance at the individual server level. Our observations help correlate power consumption of production servers with their activity, and identify easily implementable improvements. We find that production servers are underutilized from an activity perspective; are overrated from a power perspective; execute temporally similar workloads over a granularity of weeks; do not idle efficiently; and have power consumptions that are well tracked by their CPU utilizations. Our measurements suggest the following steps for improvement: staggering periodic activities on servers; enabling deeper sleep states; and provisioning based on measurement.
Arunchandar Vasan 0001, Anand Sivasubramaniam, Vikrant Shimpi, T. Sivabalan, Rajesh Subbiah
HPCA5