Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrei Cristian Nica
dblp:230/0706
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 77% Reinforcement learning · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
protein backbone generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
generative modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning GFlowNets From Partial Episodes For Improved Convergence And Stability · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning GFlowNets From Partial Episodes For Improved Convergence And Stability · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
riemannian optimal transport · 1.5SE(3) flow matching · 1.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.7TD(lambda) · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Incremental Sequence Classification with Temporal ConsistencyabstractWe address the problem of incremental sequence classification, where predictions are updated as new elements in the sequence are revealed. Drawing on temporal-difference learning from reinforcement learning, we identify a temporal-consistency condition that successive predictions should satisfy. We leverage this condition to develop a novel loss function for training incremental sequence classifiers. Through a concrete example, we demonstrate that optimizing this loss can offer substantial gains in data efficiency. We apply our method to text classification tasks and show that it improves predictive accuracy over competing approaches on several benchmark datasets. We further evaluate our approach on the task of verifying large language model generations for correctness in grade-school math problems. Our results show that models trained with our method are better able to distinguish promising generations from unpromising ones after observing only a few tokens. Lucas Maystre, Gabriel Barello, Tudor Berariu, Aleix Cambray, Rares Dolga, Alvaro Ortega Gonzalez, Andrei Cristian Nica, David Barber |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone GenerationabstractThe computational design of novel protein structures has the potential to impact numerous scientific disciplines greatly. Toward this goal, we introduce \foldflow, a series of novel generative models of increasing modeling power based on the flow-matching paradigm over $3\mathrm{D}$ rigid motions---i.e. the group $\mathrm{SE(3)}$---enabling accurate modeling of protein backbones. We first introduce $\text{FoldFlow-Base}$, a simulation-free approach to learning deterministic continuous-time dynamics and matching invariant target distributions on $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. We next accelerate training by incorporating Riemannian optimal transport to create $\text{FoldFlow-OT}$, leading to the construction of both more simple and stable flows. Finally, we design \foldflowsfm, coupling both Riemannian OT and simulation-free training to learn stochastic continuous-time dynamics over $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. Our family of $\text{FoldFlow}$, generative models offers several key advantages over previous approaches to the generative modeling of proteins: they are more stable and faster to train than diffusion-based approaches, and our models enjoy the ability to map any invariant source distribution to any invariant target distribution over $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. Empirically, we validate $\text{FoldFlow}$, on protein backbone generation of up to $300$ amino acids leading to high-quality designable, diverse, and novel samples. Joey Bose, Tara Akhound-Sadegh, Guillaume Huguet, Kilian Fatras, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Cheng-Hao Liu, Andrei Cristian Nica, Maksym Korablyov, Michael M. Bronstein, Alexander Tong 0001 |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2023 | Learning GFlowNets From Partial Episodes For Improved Convergence And StabilityabstractGenerative flow networks (GFlowNets) are a family of algorithms for training a sequential sampler of discrete objects under an unnormalized target density and have been successfully used for various probabilistic modeling tasks. Existing training objectives for GFlowNets are either local to states or transitions, or propagate a reward signal over an entire sampling trajectory. We argue that these alternatives represent opposite ends of a gradient bias-variance tradeoff and propose a way to exploit this tradeoff to mitigate its harmful effects. Inspired by the TD($\lambda$) algorithm in reinforcement learning, we introduce *subtrajectory balance* or SubTB($\lambda$), a GFlowNet training objective that can learn from partial action subsequences of varying lengths. We show that SubTB($\lambda$) accelerates sampler convergence in previously studied and new environments and enables training GFlowNets in environments with longer action sequences and sparser reward landscapes than what was possible before. We also perform a comparative analysis of stochastic gradient dynamics, shedding light on the bias-variance tradeoff in GFlowNet training and the advantages of subtrajectory balance. Kanika Madan, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Maksym Korablyov, Emmanuel Bengio, Moksh Jain, Andrei Cristian Nica, Tom Bosc, Yoshua Bengio, Nikolay Malkin |
ICML | 6 |