Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rotal Kat
dblp:230/1386
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 62% Video understanding and tracking · 38% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image registration |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Matching Pixels Using Co-Occurrence Statistics · CVPR 2018 |
Image and video processing › image registration
lucas-kanade registration |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Matching Pixels Using Co-Occurrence Statistics · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking › discriminative tracking
correlation filter tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Matching Pixels Using Co-Occurrence Statistics · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Matching Pixels Using Co-Occurrence Statistics · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
embedding scheme · 0.7co-occurrence statistics · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Matching Pixels Using Co-Occurrence StatisticsabstractWe propose a new error measure for matching pixels that is based on co-occurrence statistics. The measure relies on a co-occurrence matrix that counts the number of times pairs of pixel values co-occur within a window. The error incurred by matching a pair of pixels is inversely proportional to the probability that their values co-occur together, and not their color difference. This measure also works with features other than color, e.g. deep features. We show that this improves the state-of-the-art performance of template matching on standard benchmarks. We then propose an embedding scheme that maps the input image to an embedded image such that the Euclidean distance between pixel values in the embedded space resembles the co-occurrence statistics in the original space. This lets us run existing vision algorithms on the embedded images and enjoy the power of co-occurrence statistics for free. We demonstrate this on two algorithms, the Lucas-Kanade image registration and the Kernelized Correlation Filter (KCF) tracker. Experiments show that performance of each algorithm improves by about 10%. Rotal Kat, Roy Josef Jevnisek, Shai Avidan |
CVPR | 1 |