Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Belynda Hicks
dblp:230/3239
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8014-4888ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › variant calling
de novo mutation detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TriosCompass: a snakemake workflow for integrated detection of SNVs, indels, STRs, and structural de novo variants in parent-child trios · Bioinform. 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › association testing
parent-child trio analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TriosCompass: a snakemake workflow for integrated detection of SNVs, indels, STRs, and structural de novo variants in parent-child trios · Bioinform. 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PLCOjs, a FAIR GWAS web SDK for the NCI Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Genetic Atlas project · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PLCOjs, a FAIR GWAS web SDK for the NCI Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Genetic Atlas project · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant calling |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | TriosCompass: a snakemake workflow for integrated detection of SNVs, indels, STRs, and structural de novo variants in parent-child trios · Bioinform. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
snakemake workflow · 1.0data visualization · 0.6REST API · 0.6JavaScript SDK · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | TriosCompass: a snakemake workflow for integrated detection of SNVs, indels, STRs, and structural de novo variants in parent-child triosabstractMOTIVATION: The accurate and sensitive identification of de novo variants, which are unique to an individual and not found in the parents' germlines, is critical for understanding the genetic basis of rare diseases, developmental disorders, and evolutionary processes. Existing de novo variant detection pipelines often lack the flexibility to handle multiple variant types, struggle with speed and reproducibility across computational environments, demand extensive manual configuration, or require bioinformatics expertise for downstream curation and analysis, limiting their scalability and usability for large genomic studies. Accordingly, there is a pressing need to better address these challenges. RESULTS: We introduce TriosCompass, an open-source Snakemake workflow that addresses these challenges by providing a modular, accelerated, and environmentally-configurable end-to-end solution for comprehensive de novo variant discovery. It integrates state-of-the-art tools into a reproducible framework, empowering researchers to discover novel genetic insights with greater efficiency and reliability. AVAILABILITY: TriosCompass is implemented as a Snakemake workflow and is freely available at https://github.com/NCI-CGR/TriosCompass_v2 or on Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.17981062). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data is available on GitHub at https://github.com/NCI-CGR/TriosCompass_v2/tree/manuscript/report_dashboards. Supplementary methods on DeepTrio benchmark runs can be viewed at: https://github.com/NCI-CGR/TriosCompass_v2/blob/manuscript/TriosCompass_Supp_Methods_deeptrio_benchmark.md. Meredith Yeager, Eric T. Dawson, Komal Jain, Belynda Hicks, Mike Dean, Stephen J. Chanock, Wendy S. W. Wong |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2022 | PLCOjs, a FAIR GWAS web SDK for the NCI Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Genetic Atlas projectabstractMOTIVATION: The Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG) and the Division of Cancer Prevention (DCP) at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) have recently generated genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for multiple traits in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Genomic Atlas project. The GWAS included 110 000 participants. The dissemination of the genetic association data through a data portal called GWAS Explorer, in a manner that addresses the modern expectations of FAIR reusability by data scientists and engineers, is the main motivation for the development of the open-source JavaScript software development kit (SDK) reported here. RESULTS: The PLCO GWAS Explorer resource relies on a public stateless HTTP application programming interface (API) deployed as the sole backend service for both the landing page's web application and third-party analytical workflows. The core PLCOjs SDK is mapped to each of the API methods, and also to each of the reference graphic visualizations in the GWAS Explorer. A few additional visualization methods extend it. As is the norm with web SDKs, no download or installation is needed and modularization supports targeted code injection for web applications, reactive notebooks (Observable) and node-based web services. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: code at https://github.com/episphere/plco; project page at https://episphere.github.io/plco. Eric Ruan, Erika Nemeth, Richard A. Moffitt, Lorena Sandoval, Mitchell J. Machiela, Neal D. Freedman, Wenyi Huang, Wendy Wong, Kai-Ling Chen, Brian Park, Kevin Jiang, Belynda Hicks, Daniel E. Russ, Lori M. Minasian, Paul F. Pinsky, Stephen J. Chanock, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jonas S. Almeida |
Bioinform. | 12 |
| 2018 | Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentationabstractBACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing has rapidly become an essential part of precision cancer medicine. But validating results obtained from analyzing and interpreting genomic data remains a rate-limiting factor. The gold standard, of course, remains manual validation by expert panels, which is not without its weaknesses, namely high costs in both funding and time as well as the necessarily selective nature of manual validation. But it may be possible to develop more economical, complementary means of validation. In this study we employed four synthetic data sets (variants with known mutations spiked into specific genomic locations) of increasing complexity to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of five open-source variant callers: FreeBayes v1.0, VarDict v11.5.1, MuTect v1.1.7, MuTect2, and MuSE v1.0rc. FreeBayes, VarDict, and MuTect were run in bcbio-next gen, and the results were integrated into a single Ensemble call set. The known mutations provided a level of "ground truth" against which we evaluated variant-caller performance. We further facilitated the comparison and evaluation by segmenting the whole genome into 10,000,000 base-pair fragments which yielded 316 segments. RESULTS: Differences among the numbers of true positives were small among the callers, but the numbers of false positives varied much more when the tools were used to analyze sets one through three. Both FreeBayes and VarDict produced strikingly more false positives than did the others, although VarDict, somewhat paradoxically also produced the highest number of true positives. The Ensemble approach yielded results characterized by higher specificity and balanced accuracy and fewer false positives than did any of the five tools used alone. Sensitivity and specificity, however, declined for all five callers as the complexity of the data sets increased, but we did not uncover anything more than limited, weak correlations between caller performance and certain DNA structural features: gene density and guanine-cytosine content. Altogether, MuTect2 performed the best among the callers tested, followed by MuSE and MuTect. CONCLUSIONS: Spiking data sets with specific mutations -single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or structural variations (SVs) in this study-at known locations in the genome provides an effective and economical way to compare data analyzed by variant callers with ground truth. The method constitutes a viable alternative to the prolonged, expensive, and noncomprehensive assessment by expert panels. It should be further developed and refined, as should other comparatively "lightweight" methods of assessing accuracy. Given that the scientific community has not yet established gold standards for validating NGS-related technologies such as variant callers, developing multiple alternative means for verifying variant-caller accuracy will eventually lead to the establishment of higher-quality standards than could be achieved by prematurely limiting the range of innovative methods explored by members of the community. Xiaopeng Bian, Qingrong Chen, Cu Nguyen, Belynda Hicks, Daoud M. Meerzaman |
BMC Bioinform. | 7 |