Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eva Bokor
dblp:230/7021
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 50% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Legged, aerial and field robots · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
autonomous control |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system · ICRA 1991 |
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic teleoperation
force-reflecting teleoperation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system · ICRA 1991 |
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system · ICRA 1991 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
space robotics |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system · ICRA 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
force feedback · 0.0compliant control · 0.0autonomous macros · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed systemabstractOrbital replacement unit (ORU) changeout experiments were performed with the JPL/NASA telerobot testbed system for three different control modes: force reflecting teleoperation (FR), shared compliant control (SCC), and autonomous control (AC). In FR, the operator was provided with kinesthetic force feedback, feeling contact forces through a force-reflecting hand controller. In SCC, the operator controlled a compliant robot, where the robot compliance was implemented by an autonomous compliant control force feedback. In AC, telemanipulation tasks were performed autonomously by using a sequence of macros. Experimental results indicate that SCC greatly reduces the magnitudes and durations of contact forces as compared to FR. AC took the least time to complete the ORU changeout task and, with appropriate operator intervention capabilities, it could be very pleasant to use in some applications with well-structured task environments.> Won S. Kim, Paul Backes, Samad Hayati, Eva Bokor |
ICRA | 4 |