Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eva Bokor

dblp:230/7021 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 50% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Legged, aerial and field robots · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
autonomous control
0.011991
Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system · ICRA 1991
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic teleoperation
force-reflecting teleoperation
0.011991
Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system · ICRA 1991
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.011991
Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system · ICRA 1991
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
space robotics
0.011991
Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system · ICRA 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

force feedback · 0.0compliant control · 0.0autonomous macros · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Orbital replacement unit changeout experiments with a telerobot testbed system
abstract
Orbital replacement unit (ORU) changeout experiments were performed with the JPL/NASA telerobot testbed system for three different control modes: force reflecting teleoperation (FR), shared compliant control (SCC), and autonomous control (AC). In FR, the operator was provided with kinesthetic force feedback, feeling contact forces through a force-reflecting hand controller. In SCC, the operator controlled a compliant robot, where the robot compliance was implemented by an autonomous compliant control force feedback. In AC, telemanipulation tasks were performed autonomously by using a sequence of macros. Experimental results indicate that SCC greatly reduces the magnitudes and durations of contact forces as compared to FR. AC took the least time to complete the ORU changeout task and, with appropriate operator intervention capabilities, it could be very pleasant to use in some applications with well-structured task environments.>
Won S. Kim, Paul Backes, Samad Hayati, Eva Bokor
ICRA4