Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Vinke
dblp:230/7039
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | New techniques for H2 optimal control of a flexible beam · ICRA 1991 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › flexible structure control
flexible beam control |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | New techniques for H2 optimal control of a flexible beam · ICRA 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stable factorization · 0.0lagrangian multipliers · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | New techniques for H2 optimal control of a flexible beamabstractOne method of controlling a flexible beam is H/sub 2/ optimal compensation, which minimizes the mean square tracking error for a particular reference input. However, for many flexible beams the H/sub 2/ optimal compensator requires plant input magnitudes that are unrealizable. To avoid this difficulty, constrained H/sub 2/ optimal compensation is used which requires that the plant input not exceed a certain value. An algorithm based on stable factorization and a Lagrangian multiplier has been developed to solve this problem. A further difficulty in controlling flexible beams is that the usual output definition of the beam does not have a well defined model. Previous work has shown that an alternative output definition does have a well defined model. Experimental results indicate that by applying the algorithm to either model an excellent controller can be obtained.> David Vinke, Mathukumalli Vidyasagar |
ICRA | 1 |