Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xidong Pi

dblp:230/8132 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 56% Network optimization and economics · 44%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network optimization and economics › mechanism design
incentive mechanism
0.412020
iLOCuS: Incentivizing Vehicle Mobility to Optimize Sensing Distribution in Crowd Sensing · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Internet of things and sensor networks › mobile crowdsensing
vehicular crowdsensing
0.412020
iLOCuS: Incentivizing Vehicle Mobility to Optimize Sensing Distribution in Crowd Sensing · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › ride-hailing
order dispatching
0.412019
Vehicle dispatching for sensing coverage optimization in mobile crowdsensing systems: poster abstract · IPSN 2019
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › mobile crowdsourcing › crowdsensing
mobile crowdsensing
0.412019
Vehicle dispatching for sensing coverage optimization in mobile crowdsensing systems: poster abstract · IPSN 2019
Internet of things and sensor networks › sensing coverage
spatial-temporal coverage
0.112020
iLOCuS: Incentivizing Vehicle Mobility to Optimize Sensing Distribution in Crowd Sensing · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
incentive mechanism
0.112019
Vehicle dispatching for sensing coverage optimization in mobile crowdsensing systems: poster abstract · IPSN 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spatio-temporal optimization · 1.1optimization algorithm · 0.4knapsack problem · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 PAS: Prediction-Based Actuation System for City-Scale Ridesharing Vehicular Mobile Crowdsensing
abstract
Vehicular mobile crowdsensing (MCS) enables many smart city applications. Ridesharing vehicle fleets provide promising solutions to MCS due to the advantages of low cost, easy maintenance, high mobility, and long operational time. However, as nondedicated mobile sensing platforms, the first priorities of these vehicles are delivering passengers, which may lead to poor sensing coverage quality. Therefore, to help MCS derive good (large and balanced) sensing coverage quality, an actuation system is required to dispatch vehicles with a limited amount of monetary budget. This article presents PAS, a prediction-based actuation system for city-wide ridesharing vehicular MCS to achieve optimal sensing coverage quality with a limited budget. In PAS, two prediction models forecast probabilities of potential near-future vehicle routes and ride requests across the city. Based on prediction results, a prediction-based actuation planning algorithm is proposed to decide which vehicles to actuate and the corresponding routes. Experiments on city-scale deployments and physical feature-based simulations show that our PAS achieves up to 40% more improvement in sensing coverage quality and up to 20% higher ride request matching rate than baselines. In addition, to achieve a similar level of sensing coverage quality as the baseline, our PAS only needs 10% budget.
Xinlei Chen, Susu Xu, Jun Han 0001, Haohao Fu, Xidong Pi, Carlee Joe-Wong, Yong Li 0008, Lin Zhang 0001, Hae Young Noh, Pei Zhang 0001
IEEE Internet Things J.5
2020 iLOCuS: Incentivizing Vehicle Mobility to Optimize Sensing Distribution in Crowd Sensing
abstract
Vehicular crowd sensing systems are designed to achieve large spatio-temporal sensing coverage with low-cost in deployment and maintenance. For example, taxi platforms can be utilized for sensing city-wide air quality. However, the goals of vehicle agents are often inconsistent with the goal of the crowdsourcer. Vehicle agents like taxis prioritize searching for passenger ride requests (defined as task requests), which leads them to gather in busy regions. In contrast, sensing systems often need to sample data over the entire city with a desired distribution (e.g., Uniform distribution, Gaussian Mixture distribution, etc.) to ensure sufficient spatio-temporal information for further analysis. This inconsistency decreases the sensing coverage quality and thus impairs the quality of the collected information. A simple approach to reduce the inconsistency is to greedily incentivize the vehicle agents to different regions. However, incentivization brings challenges, including the heterogeneity of desired target distributions, limited budget to incentivize more vehicle agents, and the high computational complexity of optimizing incentivizing strategies. To this end, we present a vehicular crowd sensing system to efficiently incentivize the vehicle agents to match the sensing distribution of the sampled data to the desired target distribution with a limited budget. To make the system flexible to various desired target distributions, we formulate the incentivizing problem as a new type of non-linear multiple-choice knapsack problem, with the dissimilarity between the collected data distribution and the desired distribution as the objective function. To utilize the budget efficiently, we design a customized incentive by combining monetary incentives and potential task (ride) requests at the destination. Meanwhile, an efficient optimization algorithm, iLOCuS, is presented to plan the incentivizing policy for vehicle agents to decompose the sensing distribution into two distinct levels: time-location level and vehicle level, to approximate the optimal solution iteratively and reduce the dissimilarity objective. Our experimental results based on real-world data show that our system can reduce up to 26.99 percent of the dissimilarity between the sensed and target distributions compared to benchmark methods.
Susu Xu, Xinlei Chen, Xidong Pi, Carlee Joe-Wong, Pei Zhang 0001, Hae Young Noh
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.3
2019 Vehicle dispatching for sensing coverage optimization in mobile crowdsensing systems: poster abstract
abstract
Mobile crowd sensing (MCS) collects city-scale sensing data with low cost and high efficiency. One important goal of MCS is to ensure high quality of sensing coverage to provide sufficient information to data analysis end. However, the goal of the MCS may be inconsistent with the goal of vehicles. This inconsistency between goals results in a bad sensing coverage and decreases the quality of the collected information. Key challenges to resolve this inconsistency include the heterogeneous target desired spatio-temporal distributions, limited budget constraining the ability to incentivize more taxis, and high computational complexity.
Susu Xu, Xinlei Chen, Xidong Pi, Carlee Joe-Wong, Pei Zhang 0001, Hae Young Noh
IPSN3