Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thorben Funke

dblp:231/5909 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6196-8312ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 43% Graph learning · 23% Robot navigation and mapping · 19%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
online mapping
0.912025
PseudoMapTrainer: Learning Online Mapping without HD Maps · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explanation evaluation
explanation faithfulness
0.712023
Zorro: Valid, Sparse, and Stable Explanations in Graph Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
graph neural network explanation
0.712023
Zorro: Valid, Sparse, and Stable Explanations in Graph Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
Zorro: Valid, Sparse, and Stable Explanations in Graph Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
directed graph
0.412020
Low-dimensional statistical manifold embedding of directed graphs · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
low-dimensional embedding
0.412020
Low-dimensional statistical manifold embedding of directed graphs · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding
0.412020
Low-dimensional statistical manifold embedding of directed graphs · ICLR 2020
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.312025
PseudoMapTrainer: Learning Online Mapping without HD Maps · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.212023
Zorro: Valid, Sparse, and Stable Explanations in Graph Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 0.9rate-distortion theory · 0.7combinatorial optimization · 0.7statistical manifold embedding · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PseudoMapTrainer: Learning Online Mapping without HD Maps
Christian Löwens, Thorben Funke, Jingchao Xie, Alexandru Condurache
ICCV2
2024 Unsupervised Point Cloud Registration with Self-Distillation
Christian Löwens, Thorben Funke, André Wagner, Alexandru Condurache
BMVC2
2023 Private Graph Extraction via Feature Explanations
abstract
Privacy and interpretability are two important ingredients for achieving trustworthy machine learning. We study the interplay of these two aspects in graph machine learning through graph reconstruction attacks. The goal of the adversary here is to reconstruct the graph structure of the training data given access to model explanations. Based on the different kinds of auxiliary information available to the adversary, we propose several graph reconstruction attacks. We show that additional knowledge of post-hoc feature explanations substantially increases the success rate of these attacks. Further, we investigate in detail the differences between attack performance with respect to three different classes of explanation methods for graph neural networks: gradient-based, perturbation-based, and surrogate model-based methods. While gradient-based explanations reveal the most in terms of the graph structure, we find that these explanations do not always score high in utility. For the other two classes of explanations, privacy leakage increases with an increase in explanation utility. Finally, we propose a defense based on a randomized response mechanism for releasing the explanations, which substantially reduces the attack success rate. Our code is available at https://github.com/iyempissy/graph-stealing-attacks-with-explanation.
Iyiola E. Olatunji, Mandeep Rathee, Thorben Funke, Megha Khosla
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.3
2023 Zorro: Valid, Sparse, and Stable Explanations in Graph Neural Networks
abstract
With the ever-increasing popularity and applications of graph neural networks, several proposals have been made to explain and understand the decisions of a graph neural network. Explanations for graph neural networks differ in principle from other input settings. It is important to attribute the decision to input features and other related instances connected by the graph structure. We find that the previous explanation generation approaches that maximize the mutual information between the label distribution produced by the model and the explanation to be restrictive. Specifically, existing approaches do not enforce explanations to be valid, sparse, or robust to input perturbations. In this paper, we lay down some of the fundamental principles that an explanation method for graph neural networks should follow and introduce a metricRDT-Fidelityas a measure of the explanation's effectiveness. We propose a novel approach Zorro based on the principles fromrate-distortion theorythat uses a simple combinatorial procedure to optimize for RDT-Fidelity. Extensive experiments on real and synthetic datasets reveal that Zorro produces sparser, stable, and more faithful explanations than existing graph neural network explanation approaches.
Thorben Funke, Megha Khosla, Mandeep Rathee, Avishek Anand
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2022 W-trace: robust and effective watermarking for GPS trajectories
abstract
With the rise of data-driven methods for traffic forecasting, accident prediction, and profiling driving behavior, personal GPS trajectory data has become an essential asset for businesses and emerging data markets. However, as personal data, GPS trajectories require protection. Especially by data breaches, verification of GPS data ownership is a challenging problem. Watermarking facilitates data ownership verification by encoding provenance information into the data. GPS trajectory watermarking is particularly challenging due to the spatio-temporal data properties and easiness of data modification; as a result, existing methods embed only minimal provenance information and lack robustness. In this paper, we propose W-Trace - a novel GPS trajectory watermarking method based on Fourier transformation. We demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of W-Trace on two real-world GPS trajectory datasets.
Rajjat Dadwal, Thorben Funke, Michael Nüsken, Elena Demidova
SIGSPATIAL/GIS2
2020 Low-dimensional statistical manifold embedding of directed graphs
Thorben Funke, Tian Guo 0002, Alen Lancic, Nino Antulov-Fantulin
ICLR1