Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Breeanne Baker Swart

dblp:232/1257 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-8375-5390ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › multicast routing
delay-constrained multicast
0.312018
Multicast Routing Using Delay Intervals for Collaborative and Competitive Applications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2018
Routing and switching
multicast routing
0.312018
Multicast Routing Using Delay Intervals for Collaborative and Competitive Applications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2018
Routing and switching
qos routing
0.312018
Multicast Routing Using Delay Intervals for Collaborative and Competitive Applications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.3interval multicast algorithm · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Multicast Routing Using Delay Intervals for Collaborative and Competitive Applications
abstract
Collaborative and competitive applications require that participants receive messages almost simultaneously and before a specified time. These requirements have been addressed by the delay variation-bounded multicasting tree (DVBMT) problem. In this paper, we propose the interval multicast subgraph (IMS) problem to address these requirements. IMS addresses these constraints with an interval of acceptable delay values for paths as user input from a source to a destination, eliminating the need to optimize delays for a variation value. By solving IMS rather than DVBMT and other variants of DVBMT, we are able to find solutions for larger graphs more efficiently. Our proposed interval multicast algorithm (IMA) accounts for an interval of acceptable delay as user input and guarantees the weight of each path from the source to a distinct destination is within the given interval if that path exists. We provide proofs of correctness and complexity of IMA, as well as simulation experiments, to illustrate the effects of various parameters on our algorithm. Simulations show that IMS is significantly less costly than finding the minimum variation for the average and best case. By remodeling the DVBMT problem to IMS, we have created a new problem that addresses the quality of service requirements of multicasting and is able to be solved efficiently for the average case for relatively large graphs.
James Andrus, Shankar M. Banik, Breeanne Baker Swart, Michael P. Verdicchio
IEEE Trans. Commun.3