Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rahul Rachuri

dblp:234/1089 · also Sai Rahul Rachuri · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4541-3928ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 9 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
6 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 83% Privacy and data protection · 17%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
2.952024
Cheater Identification on a Budget: MPC with Identifiable Abort from Pairwise MACs · CRYPTO (8) 2024
Ramen: Souper Fast Three-Party Computation for RAM Programs · CCS 2023
Le Mans: Dynamic and Fluid MPC for Dishonest Majority · CRYPTO (1) 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation › active security
identifiable abort
0.812024
Cheater Identification on a Budget: MPC with Identifiable Abort from Pairwise MACs · CRYPTO (8) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure computation protocols
secure computation with RAM programs
0.712023
Ramen: Souper Fast Three-Party Computation for RAM Programs · CCS 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
three-party computation
0.712023
Ramen: Souper Fast Three-Party Computation for RAM Programs · CCS 2023
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.622022
Trident: Efficient 4PC Framework for Privacy Preserving Machine Learning · NDSS 2020
Tetrad: Actively Secure 4PC for Secure Training and Inference · NDSS 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › adversarial model › corruption models
dishonest majority
0.612022
Le Mans: Dynamic and Fluid MPC for Dishonest Majority · CRYPTO (1) 2022
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
secure training and inference
0.612022
Tetrad: Actively Secure 4PC for Secure Training and Inference · NDSS 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secret sharing
0.112020
Improved Primitives for MPC over Mixed Arithmetic-Binary Circuits · CRYPTO (2) 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

message authentication code · 0.8RAM program evaluation · 0.7secure multiparty computation · 0.6secret sharing · 0.4oblivious transfer · 0.4arithmetic-binary circuit conversion · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Block-Accumulate Codes: Accelerated Linear Codes for PCGs and ZK
Vladimir Kolesnikov, Stanislav Peceny, Rahul Rachuri, Srinivasan Raghuraman, Peter Rindal, Harshal Shah
CRYPTO (8)3
2026 Covert Attacks on Machine Learning Training in Passively Secure MPC
Matthew Jagielski, Rahul Rachuri, Peter Scholl, Daniel Escudero 0001
EuroS&P2
2026 Secure and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning
abstract
We propose a novel end-to-end privacy-preserving framework, instantiated by three efficient protocols for different deployment scenarios, covering both input and output privacy, for the vertically split scenario in federated learning (FL), where features are split across clients and labels are not shared by all parties. We do so by distributing the role of the aggregator in FL into multiple servers and having them run secure multiparty computation (MPC) protocols to perform model and feature aggregation and apply differential privacy (DP) to the final released model. While a naive solution would have the clients delegating the entirety of training to run in MPC between the servers, our optimized solution, which supports purely global and also global-local models updates with privacy-preserving, drastically reduces the amount of computation and communication performed using multiparty computation. The experimental results also show the effectiveness of our protocols.
Rahul Rachuri, Anderson C. A. Nascimento, Yiwei Cai
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.2
2024 Cheater Identification on a Budget: MPC with Identifiable Abort from Pairwise MACs
Carsten Baum, Nikolas Melissaris, Rahul Rachuri, Peter Scholl
CRYPTO (8)3
2023 Ramen: Souper Fast Three-Party Computation for RAM Programs
abstract
Secure RAM computation allows a number of parties to evaluate a function represented as a random-access machine (RAM) program in a way that reveals nothing about the private inputs of the parties except from what is already revealed by the function output itself. In this work we present Ramen, which is a new protocol for computing RAM programs securely among three parties, tolerating up to one passive corruption. Ramen provides reasonable asymptotic guarantees and is concretely efficient at the same time. We have implemented our protocol and provide extensive benchmarks for various settings.
Lennart Braun, Mahak Pancholi, Rahul Rachuri, Mark Simkin 0001
CCS3
2022 Le Mans: Dynamic and Fluid MPC for Dishonest Majority
Rahul Rachuri, Peter Scholl
CRYPTO (1)1
2022 Tetrad: Actively Secure 4PC for Secure Training and Inference
Nishat Koti, Arpita Patra, Rahul Rachuri, Ajith Suresh
NDSS3
2020 Improved Primitives for MPC over Mixed Arithmetic-Binary Circuits
Daniel Escudero 0001, Satrajit Ghosh, Marcel Keller, Rahul Rachuri, Peter Scholl
CRYPTO (2)4
2020 Trident: Efficient 4PC Framework for Privacy Preserving Machine Learning
Harsh Chaudhari, Rahul Rachuri, Ajith Suresh
NDSS2
2018 Modeling Confirmation Bias Through Egoism and Trust in a Multi Agent System
abstract
Permanent memory, and biases that humans have such as confirmation bias, are not modeled in some of the leading strategies in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. This reduces their effectiveness at modeling actual human behaviors. As a solution to this problem we have proposed a framework to model egoistic agents using trust. This framework accounts for such flaws in human behavior, and provides a more accurate representation of human nature by modeling confirmation bias through egoism and trust. The agents of this model divide their neighboring agents into two sets, I and Non-I, and the actions taken against a neighbor are influenced by the set it belongs to. This framework can be used to modify existing strategies such as Tit-For-Tat to make them more realistic. Using this framework, we have also proposed a trust based strategy and evaluated it. Our strategy does better than the other strategies in pairwise comparisons, and also when there is a combination of different agents in the environment.
Seetarama Raju Pericherla, Rahul Rachuri, Shrisha Rao 0001
SMC2