Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bipana Thapaliya

dblp:234/2713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-5103-9330ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives › physical unclonable function
modeling attack
0.612022
Neural Network Modeling Attacks on Arbiter-PUF-Based Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2022
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives
physical unclonable function
0.612022
Neural Network Modeling Attacks on Arbiter-PUF-Based Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2022
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives › physical unclonable function
arbiter PUF
0.212022
Neural Network Modeling Attacks on Arbiter-PUF-Based Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2022
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives › physical unclonable function › arbiter PUF
XOR arbiter PUF
0.212022
Neural Network Modeling Attacks on Arbiter-PUF-Based Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 0.6logistic regression · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Neural Network Modeling Attacks on Arbiter-PUF-Based Designs
abstract
By revisiting, improving, and extending recent neural-network based modeling attacks on XOR Arbiter PUFs from the literature, we show that XOR Arbiter PUFs, (XOR) Feed-Forward Arbiter PUFs, and Interpose PUFs can be attacked faster, up to larger security parameters, and with an order of magnitude fewer challenge-response pairs than previously known both in simulation and in silicon data. To support our claim, we discuss the differences and similarities of recently proposed modeling attacks and offer a fair comparison of the performance of these attacks by implementing all of them using the popular machine learning framework Keras and comparing their performance against the well-studied Logistic Regression attack. Our findings show that neural-network-based modeling attacks have the potential to outperform traditional modeling attacks on PUFs and must hence become part of the standard toolbox for PUF security analysis; the code and discussion in this paper can serve as a basis for the extension of our results to PUF designs beyond the scope of this work.
Nils Wisiol, Bipana Thapaliya, Khalid T. Mursi, Jean-Pierre Seifert
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2
2021 Machine Learning-based Vulnerability Study of Interpose PUFs as Security Primitives for IoT Networks
abstract
Security is of importance for communication networks, and many network nodes, like sensors and IoT devices, are resource-constrained. Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) leverage physical variations of the integrated circuits to produce responses unique to individual circuits and have the potential for delivering security for low-cost networks. But before a PUF can be adopted for security applications, all security vulnerabilities must be discovered. Recently, a new PUF known as Interpose PUF (IPUF) was proposed, which was tested to be secure against reliability-based modeling attacks and machine learning attacks when the attacked IPUF is of small size. A recent study showed IPUFs succumbed to a divide-and-conquer attack, and the attack method requires the position of the interpose bit known to the attacker, a condition that can be easily obfuscated by using a random interpose position. Thus, large IPUFs may still remain secure against all known modeling attacks if the interpose position is unknown to attackers. In this paper, we present a new modeling attack method of IPUFs using multilayer neural networks, and the attack method requires no knowledge of the interpose position. Our attack was tested on simulated IPUFs and silicon IPUFs implemented on FPGAs, and the results showed that many IPUFs which were resilient against existing attacks cannot withstand our new attack method, revealing a new vulnerability of IPUFs by re-defining the boundary between secure and insecure regions in the IPUF parameter space.
Bipana Thapaliya, Khalid T. Mursi
NAS1
2018 LaHiIO: Accelerating Persistent Big Data Machine Learning via Latency Hiding IOs
abstract
The increasing use of big datasets by analytics applications for higher predictive power leads to higher processing overhead, and the overhead becomes more substantial when datasets are larger than memory capacity. In this paper, we focus on reducing I/O overhead for big data machine learning procedures, including both unsupervised and supervised learning. While I/O data are, in general, not reducible in well-developed applications, our approach to I/O overhead reduction is to overlap I/O's with computations so that when an application is performing an I/O, other useful computation is also processed. To this end, we develop an I/O latency-hiding (LaHiIO) strategy and an enabling easy-to-use API, a wrapper of existing asynchronous I/O operations, by hiding away features not likely needed for general data analytics applications and keeping only those necessary for computation-I/O overlapping. By doing so, we aim to increase the use of computation-I/O overlapping in big data applications by a broad range of developers who could be physicists, chemists, biologists, engineers, but not necessarily system programming experts. We apply the LaHiIO strategy to clustering and neural network procedures, the common choices for unsupervised and supervised learning, resulting in significant performance enhancement from about 10% to 150%, indicating the effectiveness of the LaHiIO strategy and its enabling user-friendly API for big data machine learning applications.
Ahmad O. Aseeri, Mohammed Saeed Alkatheiri, Bipana Thapaliya
IEEE BigData4