Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Md Mosharaf Hossain

dblp:234/2994 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1554-3476ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 39% Trustworthy machine learning · 17%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic analysis
negation understanding
1.022022
Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding · EMNLP 2022
An Analysis of Natural Language Inference Benchmarks through the Lens of Negation · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
0.812024
HalluMeasure: Fine-grained Hallucination Measurement Using Chain-of-Thought Reasoning · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › hallucination
hallucination evaluation
0.812024
HalluMeasure: Fine-grained Hallucination Measurement Using Chain-of-Thought Reasoning · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference
0.622022
An Analysis of Natural Language Inference Benchmarks through the Lens of Negation · EMNLP (1) 2020
Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.612022
Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic analysis
negation focus identification
0.412020
Predicting the Focus of Negation: Model and Error Analysis · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.212022
Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic analysis
negation scope detection
0.112020
Predicting the Focus of Negation: Model and Error Analysis · ACL 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

chain-of-thought reasoning · 0.8t5 · 0.6neural generator · 0.6RoBERTa · 0.6transformer models · 0.4neural network · 0.4error analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 HalluMeasure: Fine-grained Hallucination Measurement Using Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
abstract
Shayan Ali Akbar, Md Mosharaf Hossain, Tess Wood, Si-Chi Chin, Erica M Salinas, Victor Alvarez, Erwin Cornejo. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Shayan Ali Akbar, Md Mosharaf Hossain, Tess Wood, Si-Chi Chin, Erica Salinas, Erwin Cornejo
EMNLP2
2022 Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding
abstract
Negation poses a challenge in many natural language understanding tasks.Inspired by the fact that understanding a negated statement often requires humans to infer affirmative interpretations, in this paper we show that doing so benefits models for three natural language understanding tasks.We present an automated procedure to collect pairs of sentences with negation and their affirmative interpretations, resulting in over 150,000 pairs.Experimental results show that leveraging these pairs helps (a) T5 generate affirmative interpretations from negations in a previous benchmark, and (b) a RoBERTa-based classifier solve the task of natural language inference.We also leverage our pairs to build a plug-and-play neural generator that given a negated statement generates an affirmative interpretation.Then, we incorporate the pretrained generator into a RoBERTa-based classifier for sentiment analysis and show that doing so improves the results.Crucially, our proposal does not require any manual effort.* Work was done prior to joining Amazon. English-Norwegian (en-no) parallel sentences: (en)There is no more than one Truth.(no) Og det finnes kun en Sannhet.Backtranslation: And there is only one truth.English-Spanish (en-es) parallel sentences: (en) The term gained traction only after 1999.(es) El término no se popularizó hasta después del 1999.
Md Mosharaf Hossain, Eduardo Blanco 0002
EMNLP1
2020 Predicting the Focus of Negation: Model and Error Analysis
abstract
The focus of a negation is the set of tokens intended to be negated, and a key component for revealing affirmative alternatives to negated utterances.In this paper, we experiment with neural networks to predict the focus of negation.Our main novelty is leveraging a scope detector to introduce the scope of negation as an additional input to the network.Experimental results show that doing so obtains the best results to date.Additionally, we perform a detailed error analysis providing insights into the main error categories, and analyze errors depending on whether the model takes into account scope and context information.
Md Mosharaf Hossain, Kathleen E. Hamilton, Alexis Palmer, Eduardo Blanco 0002
ACL1
2020 An Analysis of Natural Language Inference Benchmarks through the Lens of Negation
abstract
Negation is underrepresented in existing natural language inference benchmarks.Additionally, one can often ignore the few negations in existing benchmarks and still make the right inference judgments.In this paper, we present a new benchmark for natural language inference in which negation plays an important role.We also show that state-of-the-art transformers struggle making inference judgments with the new pairs. Original pairNew pair w/ negation RTE T: Tropical Storm Debby is blamed for several deaths across the Caribbean.T neg : Tropical Storm Debby is not blamed for several deaths across the Caribbean.H: A tropical storm has caused loss of life.H neg : A tropical storm has not caused loss of life.
Md Mosharaf Hossain, Venelin Kovatchev, Pranoy Dutta, Tiffany Kao, Elizabeth Wei, Eduardo Blanco 0002
EMNLP (1)1
2018 A Flexible-blocking Based Approach for Performance Tuning of Matrix Multiplication Routines for Large Matrices with Edge Cases
abstract
Efficient and scalable matrix operations are being highly demanding in the recent era of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Big Data Analytics. The two commonly used matrix-matrix operations in the Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS) specification are General Matrix-Matrix multiplication (GEMM) and Symmetric Rank-k update (SYRK). The SYRK routine is a specialization of the GEMM routine, where half of the multiplications are skipped as the resultant matrix is known to be symmetric. Fortunately, several linear algebra libraries implement these BLAS routines quite efficiently. The libraries usually partition the input matrices into blocks and place them in processor caches, thus improving performance by leveraging the caches. However, the contemporary libraries are highly optimized for squarish matrices, but the performance degrades significantly for the matrices with edge case (strictly thin or strictly fat shapes) in the multicore machine. The primary reason is that the current state-of-the-art libraries make fixed block shapes based on a processor architecture, and do not consider the shape of the input matrices. In this paper, we propose a new blocking approach, we name it Flexible-blocking, to mitigate the scalability issues. In contrast to the contemporary libraries, our approach formulates the blocks of the input matrices based on the shapes of the matrices as well as the number of threads used in the implementation. Our proposed technique shows noticeable performance improvement on multicore shared-memory machines for the edge case matrices.
Md Mosharaf Hossain, Thomas M. Hines, Sheikh K. Ghafoor, Sheikh Rabiul Islam, Ramakrishnan Kannan, Sreenivas R. Sukumar 0001
IEEE BigData1