Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anna Zeng
dblp:234/4340
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-7224-363XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 54% Graph data management · 36% Information retrieval · 11% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 69% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 31% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal DAG Summarization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Graph data management
graph summarization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal DAG Summarization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning › table understanding › table annotation
attribute discovery |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Data Integration · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Information retrieval
text summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Causal DAG Summarization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causality
causal DAG |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Data Integration · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal graph |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Data Integration · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
greedy algorithm · 1.7causal inference · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Causal DAG SummarizationabstractCausal inference aids researchers in discovering cause-and-effect relationships, leading to scientific insights. Accurate causal estimation requires identifying confounding variables to avoid false discoveries. Pearl's causal model uses causal DAGs to identify confounding variables, but incorrect DAGs can lead to unreliable causal conclusions. However, for high dimensional data, the causal DAGs are often complex beyond human verifiability. Graph summarization is a logical next step, but current methods for general-purpose graph summarization are inadequate for causal DAG summarization. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing a causal graph summarization objective that balances graph simplification for better understanding while retaining essential causal information for reliable inference. We develop an efficient greedy algorithm and show that summary causal DAGs can be directly used for inference and are more robust to misspecification of assumptions, enhancing robustness for causal inference. Experimenting with six real-life datasets, we compared our algorithm to three existing solutions, showing its effectiveness in handling high-dimensional data and its ability to generate summary DAGs that ensure both reliable causal inference and robustness against misspecifications. Anna Zeng, Michael J. Cafarella, Batya Kenig, Markos Markakis, Brit Youngmann, Babak Salimi |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2023 | Causal Data IntegrationabstractCausal inference is fundamental to empirical scientific discoveries in natural and social sciences; however, in the process of conducting causal inference, data management problems can lead to false discoveries. Two such problems are (i) not having all attributes required for analysis, and (ii) misidentifying which attributes are to be included in the analysis. Analysts often only have access to partial data, and they critically rely on (often unavailable or incomplete) domain knowledge to identify attributes to include for analysis, which is often given in the form of a causal DAG. We argue that data management techniques can surmount both of these challenges. In this work, we introduce the Causal Data Integration (CDI) problem, in which unobserved attributes are mined from external sources and a corresponding causal DAG is automatically built. We identify key challenges and research opportunities in designing a CDI system, and present a system architecture for solving the CDI problem. Our preliminary experimental results demonstrate that solving CDI is achievable and pave the way for future research. Brit Youngmann, Michael J. Cafarella, Babak Salimi, Anna Zeng |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 4 |
| 2022 | Building a Shared Conceptual Model of Complex, Heterogeneous Data Systems: A Demonstration
Michael R. Anderson, Yuze Lou, Jiayun Zou, Michael J. Cafarella, Sarah E. Chasins, Doug Downey, Dinghao Shen, Jenny M. Vo-Phamhi, Anna Zeng |
CIDR | 13 |