Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mengmei Zhang
dblp:234/4670
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
4as first author
12since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4581-0977ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 9 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
13 papers |
Graph learning · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 29% Language models and text generation · 18% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 65% Systems and software security · 35% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 54% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 46% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Recommender systems · 77% Knowledge graphs · 23% |
Topics — the 29 heaviest of 34, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
2.8 | 4 | 2025 | Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks? · KDD (1) 2025 Endowing Pre-trained Graph Models with Provable Fairness · WWW 2024 Unveiling the Secrets without Data: Can Graph Neural Networks Be Exploited through Data-Free Model Extraction Attacks? · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
2.5 | 4 | 2025 | Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks? · KDD (1) 2025 Minimum Topology Attacks for Graph Neural Networks · WWW 2023 Robust Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial Attacks · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
graph neural network robustness |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks? · KDD (1) 2025 Minimum Topology Attacks for Graph Neural Networks · WWW 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
1.4 | 3 | 2025 | Graph Foundation Models: Concepts, Opportunities and Challenges · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks? · KDD (1) 2025 GraphTranslator: Aligning Graph Model to Large Language Model for Open-ended Tasks · WWW 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial defense |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Robust Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial Attacks · AAAI 2022 Adversarial Label-Flipping Attack and Defense for Graph Neural Networks · ICDM 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FRiskGPT: A Generative Foundation Model for Financial Risk Detection · WWW 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › instruction tuning
graph instruction tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Toward Graph-Tokenizing Large Language Models with Reconstructive Graph Instruction Tuning · WWW 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Toward Graph-Tokenizing Large Language Models with Reconstructive Graph Instruction Tuning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph neural network security
graph adversarial learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks? · KDD (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Graph Foundation Models: Concepts, Opportunities and Challenges · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
LLM-enhanced graph learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Graph Foundation Models: Concepts, Opportunities and Challenges · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
multimodal pretraining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Advancing Molecular Graph-Text Pre-training via Fine-grained Alignment · KDD (2) 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
molecular representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Advancing Molecular Graph-Text Pre-training via Fine-grained Alignment · KDD (2) 2025 |
Recommender systems
federated recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Byzantine Robustness in Federated Recommendation from Sparse Aggregation Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Systems and software security › distributed system security
byzantine attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Byzantine Robustness in Federated Recommendation from Sparse Aggregation Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Byzantine Robustness in Federated Recommendation from Sparse Aggregation Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Endowing Pre-trained Graph Models with Provable Fairness · WWW 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
pre-trained graph model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Endowing Pre-trained Graph Models with Provable Fairness · WWW 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
zero-shot node classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GraphTranslator: Aligning Graph Model to Large Language Model for Open-ended Tasks · WWW 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unveiling the Secrets without Data: Can Graph Neural Networks Be Exploited through Data-Free Model Extraction Attacks? · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Provable Training for Graph Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Provable Training for Graph Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › graph adversarial attack
topology attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Minimum Topology Attacks for Graph Neural Networks · WWW 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterogeneous graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial Attacks · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › data poisoning
label-flipping attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Label-Flipping Attack and Defense for Graph Neural Networks · ICDM 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Byzantine Robustness in Federated Recommendation from Sparse Aggregation Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
pre-training and adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Graph Foundation Models: Concepts, Opportunities and Challenges · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › aggregation function
sparse aggregation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Byzantine Robustness in Federated Recommendation from Sparse Aggregation Perspective · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › attention-based graph neural network
graph attention network |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Robust Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial Attacks · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 3.4pre-training · 2.6masked multimodal modeling · 2.6byzantine attack strategy · 2.6generative model · 2.0reconstructive instruction tuning · 1.0graph tokenization · 1.0large language model · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9adversarial attack · 0.9data-free model extraction · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Toward Graph-Tokenizing Large Language Models with Reconstructive Graph Instruction Tuning
Zhongjian Zhang, Xiao Wang 0017, Mengmei Zhang, Jiarui Tan, Chuan Shi 0001 |
WWW | 3 |
| 2026 | FRiskGPT: A Generative Foundation Model for Financial Risk Detection
Zhongjian Zhang, Mengmei Zhang, Dehua Xu, Rongjun Shi, Fuli Meng, Huajian Xu, Xiao Wang 0017, Junze Chen, Minwei Tang, Chuan Shi 0001 |
WWW | 2 |
| 2025 | Rethinking Byzantine Robustness in Federated Recommendation from Sparse Aggregation PerspectiveabstractTo preserve user privacy in recommender systems, federated recommendation (FR) based on federated learning (FL) emerges, keeping the personal data on the local client and updating a model collaboratively. Unlike FL, FR has a unique sparse aggregation mechanism, where the embedding of each item is updated by only partial clients, instead of full clients in a dense aggregation of general FL. Recently, as an essential principle of FL, model security has received increasing attention, especially for Byzantine attacks, where malicious clients can send arbitrary updates. The problem of exploring the Byzantine robustness of FR is particularly critical since in the domains applying FR, e.g., e-commerce, malicious clients can be injected easily by registering new accounts. However, existing Byzantine works neglect the unique sparse aggregation of FR, making them unsuitable for our problem. Thus, we make the first effort to investigate Byzantine attacks on FR from the perspective of sparse aggregation, which is non-trivial: it is not clear how to define Byzantine robustness under sparse aggregations and design Byzantine attacks under limited knowledge/capability. In this paper, we reformulate the Byzantine robustness under sparse aggregation by defining the aggregation for a single item as the smallest execution unit. Then we propose a family of effective attack strategies, named Spattack, which exploit the vulnerability in sparse aggregation and are categorized along the adversary's knowledge and capability. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that Spattack can effectively prevent convergence and even break down defenses under a few malicious clients, raising alarms for securing FR systems. Zhongjian Zhang, Mengmei Zhang, Xiao Wang 0017, Lingjuan Lyu, Bo Yan 0005, Junping Du 0001, Chuan Shi 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Advancing Molecular Graph-Text Pre-training via Fine-grained AlignmentabstractUnderstanding molecular structure and related knowledge is crucial for scientific research. Recent studies integrate molecular graphs with their textual descriptions to enhance molecular representation learning. However, they focus on the whole molecular graph and neglect frequently occurring subgraphs, known as motifs, which are essential for determining molecular properties. Without such fine-grained knowledge, these models struggle to generalize to unseen molecules and tasks that require motif-level insights. To bridge this gap, we propose FineMolTex, a novel Fine-grained Molecular graph-Text pre-training framework to jointly learn coarse-grained molecule-level knowledge and fine-grained motif-level knowledge. Specifically, FineMolTex consists of two pre-training tasks: a contrastive alignment task for coarse-grained matching and a masked multi-modal modeling task for fine-grained matching. In particular, the latter predicts the labels of masked motifs and words, which are selected based on their importance. By leveraging insights from both modalities, FineMolTex is able to understand the fine-grained matching between motifs and words. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments across three downstream tasks, achieving up to 230% improvement in the text-based molecule editing task. Additionally, our case studies reveal that FineMolTex successfully captures fine-grained knowledge, potentially offering valuable insights for drug discovery and catalyst design. Yuan Fang 0001, Mengmei Zhang, Chuan Shi 0001 |
KDD (2) | 3 |
| 2025 | Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks?
Zhongjian Zhang, Xiao Wang 0017, Huichi Zhou, Yue Yu 0007, Mengmei Zhang, Cheng Yang 0002, Chuan Shi 0001 |
KDD (1) | 5 |
| 2025 | Graph Foundation Models: Concepts, Opportunities and ChallengesabstractFoundation models have emerged as critical components in a variety of artificial intelligence applications, and showcase significant success in natural language processing and several other domains. Meanwhile, the field of graph machine learning is witnessing a paradigm transition from shallow methods to more sophisticated deep learning approaches. The capabilities of foundation models in generalization and adaptation motivate graph machine learning researchers to discuss the potential of developing a new graph learning paradigm. This paradigm envisions models that are pre-trained on extensive graph data and can be adapted for various graph tasks. Despite this burgeoning interest, there is a noticeable lack of clear definitions and systematic analyses pertaining to this neuicew domain. To this end, this article introduces the concept of Graph Foundation Models (GFMs), and offers an exhaustive explanation of their key characteristics and underlying technologies. We proceed to classify the existing work related to GFMs into three distinct categories, based on their dependence on graph neural networks and large language models. In addition to providing a thorough review of the current state of GFMs, this article also outlooks potential avenues for future research in this rapidly evolving domain. Jiawei Liu 0006, Cheng Yang 0002, Junze Chen, Mengmei Zhang, Ting Bai 0004, Yuan Fang 0001, Lichao Sun 0001, Philip S. Yu, Chuan Shi 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 6 |
| 2024 | Unveiling the Secrets without Data: Can Graph Neural Networks Be Exploited through Data-Free Model Extraction Attacks?
Yuanxin Zhuang, Chuan Shi 0001, Mengmei Zhang, Lingjuan Lyu, Pan Zhou 0001, Lichao Sun 0001 |
USENIX Security Symposium | 3 |
| 2024 | GraphTranslator: Aligning Graph Model to Large Language Model for Open-ended TasksabstractLarge language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, exhibit powerful zero-shot and instruction-following capabilities, have catalyzed a revolutionary transformation across diverse fields, especially for open-ended tasks. While the idea is less explored in the graph domain, despite the availability of numerous powerful graph models (GMs), they are restricted to tasks in a pre-defined form. Although several methods applying LLMs to graphs have been proposed, they fail to simultaneously handle the pre-defined and open-ended tasks, with LLM as a node feature enhancer or as a standalone predictor. To break this dilemma, we propose to bridge the pretrained GM and LLM by a Translator, named GraphTranslator, aiming to leverage GM to handle the pre-defined tasks effectively and utilize the extended interface of LLMs to offer various open-ended tasks for GM. To train such Translator, we propose a Producer capable of constructing the graph-text alignment data along node information, neighbor information and model information. By translating node representation into tokens, GraphTranslator empowers an LLM to make predictions based on language instructions, providing a unified perspective for both pre-defined and open-ended tasks. Extensive results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed GraphTranslator on zero-shot node classification. The graph question answering experiments reveal our GraphTranslator potential across a broad spectrum of open-ended tasks through language instructions. Our code is available at: https://github.com/alibaba/GraphTranslator Mengmei Zhang, Peng Wang 0133, Shen Fan, Yanhu Mo, Cheng Yang 0002, Chuan Shi 0001 |
WWW | 1 |
| 2024 | Endowing Pre-trained Graph Models with Provable FairnessabstractPre-trained graph models (PGMs) aim to capture transferable inherent structural properties and apply them to different downstream tasks. Similar to pre-trained language models, PGMs also inherit biases from human society, resulting in discriminatory behavior in downstream applications. The debiasing process of existing fair methods is generally coupled with parameter optimization of GNNs. However, different downstream tasks may be associated with different sensitive attributes in reality, directly employing existing methods to improve the fairness of PGMs is inflexible and inefficient. Moreover, most of them lack a theoretical guarantee, i.e., provable lower bounds on the fairness of model predictions, which directly provides assurance in a practical scenario. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel adapter-tuning framework that endows pre-trained Graph models with Provable fAiRness (called GraphPAR). GraphPAR freezes the parameters of PGMs and trains a parameter-efficient adapter to flexibly improve the fairness of PGMs in downstream tasks. Specifically, we design a sensitive semantic augmenter on node representations, to extend the node representations with different sensitive attribute semantics for each node. The extended representations will be used to further train an adapter, to prevent the propagation of sensitive attribute semantics from PGMs to task predictions. Furthermore, with GraphPAR, we quantify whether the fairness of each node is provable, i.e., predictions are always fair within a certain range of sensitive attribute semantics. Experimental evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate that GraphPAR achieves state-of-the-art prediction performance and fairness on node classification task. Furthermore, based on our GraphPAR, around 90% nodes have provable fairness. Zhongjian Zhang, Mengmei Zhang, Yue Yu 0007, Cheng Yang 0002, Jiawei Liu 0006, Chuan Shi 0001 |
WWW | 2 |
| 2023 | Provable Training for Graph Contrastive LearningabstractGraph Contrastive Learning (GCL) has emerged as a popular training approach for learning node embeddings from augmented graphs without labels. Despite the key principle that maximizing the similarity between positive node pairs while minimizing it between negative node pairs is well established, some fundamental problems are still unclear. Considering the complex graph structure, are some nodes consistently well-trained and following this principle even with different graph augmentations? Or are there some nodes more likely to be untrained across graph augmentations and violate the principle? How to distinguish these nodes and further guide the training of GCL? To answer these questions, we first present experimental evidence showing that the training of GCL is indeed imbalanced across all nodes. To address this problem, we propose the metric "node compactness", which is the lower bound of how a node follows the GCL principle related to the range of augmentations. We further derive the form of node compactness theoretically through bound propagation, which can be integrated into binary cross-entropy as a regularization. To this end, we propose the PrOvable Training (POT) for GCL, which regularizes the training of GCL to encode node embeddings that follows the GCL principle better. Through extensive experiments on various benchmarks, POT consistently improves the existing GCL approaches, serving as a friendly plugin. Yue Yu 0007, Xiao Wang 0017, Mengmei Zhang, Nian Liu 0001, Chuan Shi 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Minimum Topology Attacks for Graph Neural NetworksabstractWith the great popularity of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), their robustness to adversarial topology attacks has received significant attention. Although many attack methods have been proposed, they mainly focus on fixed-budget attacks, aiming at finding the most adversarial perturbations within a fixed budget for target node. However, considering the varied robustness of each node, there is an inevitable dilemma caused by the fixed budget, i.e., no successful perturbation is found when the budget is relatively small, while if it is too large, the yielding redundant perturbations will hurt the invisibility. To break this dilemma, we propose a new type of topology attack, named minimum-budget topology attack, aiming to adaptively find the minimum perturbation sufficient for a successful attack on each node. To this end, we propose an attack model, named MiBTack, based on a dynamic projected gradient descent algorithm, which can effectively solve the involving non-convex constraint optimization on discrete topology. Extensive results on three GNNs and four real-world datasets show that MiBTack can successfully lead all target nodes misclassified with the minimum perturbation edges. Moreover, the obtained minimum budget can be used to measure node robustness, so we can explore the relationships of robustness, topology, and uncertainty for nodes, which is beyond what the current fixed-budget topology attacks can offer. Mengmei Zhang, Xiao Wang 0017, Chuan Shi 0001, Lingjuan Lyu, Tianchi Yang, Junping Du 0001 |
WWW | 1 |
| 2022 | Robust Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial AttacksabstractHeterogeneous Graph Neural Networks (HGNNs) have drawn increasing attention in recent years and achieved outstanding performance in many tasks. However, despite their wide use, there is currently no understanding of their robustness to adversarial attacks. In this work, we first systematically study the robustness of HGNNs and show that they can be easily fooled by adding the adversarial edge between the target node and large-degree node (i.e., hub). Furthermore, we show two key reasons for such vulnerability of HGNNs: one is perturbation enlargement effect, i.e., HGNNs, failing to encode transiting probability, will enlarge the effect of the adversarial hub in comparison of GCNs, and the other is soft attention mechanism, i.e., such mechanism assigns positive attention values to obviously unreliable neighbors. Based on the two facts, we propose a novel robust HGNN framework RoHe against topology adversarial attacks by equipping an attention purifier, which can prune malicious neighbors based on topology and feature. Specifically, to eliminate the perturbation enlargement, we introduce the metapath-based transiting probability as the prior criterion of the purifier, restraining the confidence of malicious neighbors from the adversarial hub. Then the purifier learns to mask out neighbors with low confidence, thus can effectively alleviate the negative effect of malicious neighbors in the soft attention mechanism. Extensive experiments on different benchmark datasets for multiple HGNNs are conducted, where the considerable improvement of HGNNs under adversarial attacks will demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization ability of our defense framework. Mengmei Zhang, Xiao Wang 0017, Chuan Shi 0001, Zhiqiang Zhang 0012, Jun Zhou 0011 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Adversarial Label-Flipping Attack and Defense for Graph Neural NetworksabstractWith the great popularity of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), the robustness of GNNs to adversarial attacks has received increasing attention. However, existing works neglect adversarial label-flipping attacks, where the attacker can manipulate an unnoticeable fraction of training labels. Exploring the robustness of GNNs to label-flipping attacks is highly critical, especially when labels are collected from external sources and false labels are easy to inject (e.g., recommendation systems). In this work, we introduce the first study of adversarial label-flipping attacks on GNNs. We propose an effective attack model LafAK based on approximated closed form of GNNs and continuous surrogate of non-differentiable objective, efficiently generating attacks via gradient-based optimizers. Furthermore, we show that one key reason for the vulnerability of GNNs to label-flipping attack is overfitting to flipped nodes. Based on this observation, we propose a defense framework which introduces a community-preserving self-supervised task as regularization to avoid overfitting. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed attack model to GNNs on four real-world datasets. The effectiveness of our defense framework is also well validated by the substantial improvements of defense based GNN and its variants under label-flipping attacks. Mengmei Zhang, Linmei Hu, Chuan Shi 0001, Xiao Wang 0017 |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2018 | An Integrated Semantic-Syntactic SBLSTM Model for Aspect Specific Opinion Extraction
Zhongming Han, Mengmei Zhang, Dagao Duan |
WISA | 4 |