Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karina Bech Gleerup
dblp:234/6148
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Video understanding and tracking · 50% Face, body and person analysis · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › affective computing
pain recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Dynamics Are Important for the Recognition of Equine Pain in Video · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Dynamics Are Important for the Recognition of Equine Pain in Video · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep recurrent two-stream architecture · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Dynamics Are Important for the Recognition of Equine Pain in VideoabstractA prerequisite to successfully alleviate pain in animals is to recognize it, which is a great challenge in non-verbal species. Furthermore, prey animals such as horses tend to hide their pain. In this study, we propose a deep recurrent two-stream architecture for the task of distinguishing pain from non-pain in videos of horses. Different models are evaluated on a unique dataset showing horses under controlled trials with moderate pain induction, which has been presented in earlier work. Sequential models are experimentally compared to single-frame models, showing the importance of the temporal dimension of the data, and are benchmarked against a veterinary expert classification of the data. We additionally perform baseline comparisons with generalized versions of state-of-the-art human pain recognition methods. While equine pain detection in machine learning is a novel field, our results surpass veterinary expert performance and outperform pain detection results reported for other larger non-human species. Sofia Broomé, Karina Bech Gleerup, Pia Haubro Andersen, Hedvig Kjellström |
CVPR | 2 |