Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eliran Kachlon

dblp:234/9410 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
0as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5913-1636ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 4 since 2021Security and privacy · 6 · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
7 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 99% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 1%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Coding theory · 51% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 23% Computational complexity · 19%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
2.742025
NIZK Amplification via Leakage-Resilient Secure Computation · CRYPTO (7) 2025
Stochastic Secret Sharing with 1-Bit Shares and Applications to MPC · CRYPTO (5) 2024
The Round Complexity of Statistical MPC with Optimal Resiliency · STOC 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs
2.332025
How to Share an NP Statement or Combiners for Zero-Knowledge Proofs · CRYPTO (7) 2025
NIZK Amplification via Leakage-Resilient Secure Computation · CRYPTO (7) 2025
Verifiable Relation Sharing and Multi-verifier Zero-Knowledge in Two Rounds: Trading NIZKs with Honest Majority - (Extended Abstract) · CRYPTO (4) 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
round complexity
1.122023
The Round Complexity of Statistical MPC with Optimal Resiliency · STOC 2023
The Round Complexity of Perfect MPC with Active Security and Optimal Resiliency · FOCS 2020
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes
1.022023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · FOCS 2019
Computational complexity
pseudorandomness
1.022023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · FOCS 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory › expander graphs
unbalanced expanders
1.022023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · FOCS 2019
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secret sharing
verifiable secret sharing
1.022022
Verifiable Relation Sharing and Multi-verifier Zero-Knowledge in Two Rounds: Trading NIZKs with Honest Majority - (Extended Abstract) · CRYPTO (4) 2022
The Round Complexity of Perfect MPC with Active Security and Optimal Resiliency · FOCS 2020
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs
0.912025
NIZK Amplification via Leakage-Resilient Secure Computation · CRYPTO (7) 2025
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secret sharing
0.812024
Stochastic Secret Sharing with 1-Bit Shares and Applications to MPC · CRYPTO (5) 2024
Coding theory › distributed storage
distributed storage codes
0.812024
Conflict Checkable and Decodable Codes and Their Applications · SODA 2024
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.812024
Conflict Checkable and Decodable Codes and Their Applications · SODA 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
locally decodable codes
0.812024
Conflict Checkable and Decodable Codes and Their Applications · SODA 2024
Coding theory › distributed storage › distributed storage codes
batch codes
0.712023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › graph-based codes › sparse-graph codes
expander codes
0.712023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph sampling
0.712023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness
k-wise independence
0.712023
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Distributed computing theory › fault tolerance › byzantine fault tolerance
byzantine agreement
0.622023
The Round Complexity of Perfect MPC with Active Security and Optimal Resiliency · FOCS 2020
The Round Complexity of Statistical MPC with Optimal Resiliency · STOC 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
perfect security
0.412020
The Round Complexity of Perfect MPC with Active Security and Optimal Resiliency · FOCS 2020
Graph algorithms and graph theory
expander graphs
0.412019
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · FOCS 2019
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
pseudorandom generators
0.112019
Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error · FOCS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-knowledge proofs · 2.3secure multiparty computation · 1.6secret sharing · 1.3information-theoretic security · 1.3round-reduction · 0.9completeness of degree-2 functionalities · 0.9rejected sampling · 0.8k-wise independence · 0.8consistency graph · 0.8conflict decoding · 0.8subgraph-freeness testing · 0.7probabilistic construction · 0.7k-wise independent sampling · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 NIZK Amplification via Leakage-Resilient Secure Computation
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon
CRYPTO (7)2
2025 How to Share an NP Statement or Combiners for Zero-Knowledge Proofs
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon
CRYPTO (7)2
2024 Stochastic Secret Sharing with 1-Bit Shares and Applications to MPC
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon
CRYPTO (5)2
2024 Conflict Checkable and Decodable Codes and Their Applications
abstract
Let C be an error-correcting code over a large alphabet q of block length n, and assume that, a possibly corrupted, codeword c is distributively stored among n servers where the ith entry is being held by the ith server. Suppose that every pair of servers publicly announce whether the corresponding coordinates are “consistent” with some legal codeword or “conflicted”. What type of information about c can be inferred from this consistency graph? Can we check whether errors occurred and if so, can we find the error locations and effectively decode? We initiate the study of conflict-checkable and conflict-decodable codes and prove the following main results:
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon
SODA2
2023 The Round Complexity of Statistical MPC with Optimal Resiliency
abstract
In STOC 1989, Rabin and Ben-Or (RB) established an important milestone in the fields of cryptography and distributed computing by showing that every functionality can be computed with statistical (information-theoretic) security in the presence of an active (aka Byzantine) rushing adversary that controls up to half of the parties. We study the round complexity of general secure multiparty computation and several related tasks in the RB model.
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon, Arpita Patra
STOC2
2023 Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error
abstract
Abstract. Suppose that you wish to sample a random graph [Formula: see text] over [Formula: see text] vertices and [Formula: see text] edges conditioned on the event that [Formula: see text] does not contain a “small” [Formula: see text]-size graph [Formula: see text] (e.g., clique) as a subgraph. Assuming that most such graphs are [Formula: see text]-free, the problem can be solved by a simple rejected-sampling algorithm (that tests for [Formula: see text]-cliques) with an expected running time of [Formula: see text]. Is it possible to solve the problem in a running time that does not grow polynomially with [Formula: see text]? In this paper, we introduce the general problem of sampling a “random looking” graph [Formula: see text] with a given edge density that avoids some arbitrary predefined [Formula: see text]-size subgraph [Formula: see text]. As our main result, we show that the problem is solvable with respect to some specially crafted [Formula: see text]-wise independent distribution over graphs. That is, we design a sampling algorithm for [Formula: see text]-wise independent graphs that supports efficient testing for subgraph-freeness in time [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is a function of [Formula: see text] and the constant [Formula: see text] in the exponent is independent of [Formula: see text]. Our solution extends to the case where both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are [Formula: see text]-uniform hypergraphs. We use these algorithms to obtain the first probabilistic construction of constant-degree polynomially unbalanced expander graphs whose failure probability is negligible in [Formula: see text] (i.e., [Formula: see text]). In particular, given constants [Formula: see text], we output a bipartite graph that has [Formula: see text] left nodes and [Formula: see text] right nodes with right-degree of [Formula: see text] so that any right set of size at most [Formula: see text] expands by factor of [Formula: see text]. This result is extended to the setting of unique expansion as well. We observe that such a negligible-error construction can be employed in many useful settings and present applications in coding theory (batch codes and low-density parity-check codes), pseudorandomness (low-bias generators and randomness extractors), and cryptography. Notably, we show that our constructions yield a collection of polynomial-stretch locally computable cryptographic pseudorandom generators based on Goldreich’s one-wayness assumption resolving a central open problem in the area of parallel-time cryptography (e.g., Applebaum, Ishai, and Kushilevitz [ SIAM J. Comput., 36 (2006), pp. 845–888] and Ishai et al. [ Proceedings of the 40 th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM, 2008, pp. 433–442]).
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon
SIAM J. Comput.2
2022 Verifiable Relation Sharing and Multi-verifier Zero-Knowledge in Two Rounds: Trading NIZKs with Honest Majority - (Extended Abstract)
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon, Arpita Patra
CRYPTO (4)2
2022 Round-Optimal Honest-Majority MPC in Minicrypt and with Everlasting Security - (Extended Abstract)
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon, Arpita Patra
TCC (2)2
2020 The Round Complexity of Perfect MPC with Active Security and Optimal Resiliency
abstract
In STOC 1988, Ben-Or, Goldwasser, and Wigderson (BGW) established an important milestone in the fields of cryptography and distributed computing by showing that every functionality can be computed with perfect (information-theoretic and error-free) security at the presence of an active (aka Byzantine) rushing adversary that controls up to n/3 of the parties. We study the round complexity of general secure multiparty computation in the BGW model. Our main result shows that every functionality can be realized in only four rounds of interaction, and that some functionalities cannot be computed in three rounds. This completely settles the round-complexity of perfect actively-secure optimally-resilient MPC, resolving a long line of research. Our lower-bound is based on a novel round-reduction technique that allows us to lift existing three-round lower-bounds for verifiable secret sharing to four-round lower-bounds for general MPC. To prove the upper-bound, we develop new round-efficient protocols for computing degree-2 functionalities over large fields, and establish the completeness of such functionalities. The latter result extends the recent completeness theorem of Applebaum, Brakerski and Tsabary (TCC 2018, Eurocrypt 2019) that was limited to the binary field.
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon, Arpita Patra
FOCS2
2020 The Resiliency of MPC with Low Interaction: The Benefit of Making Errors (Extended Abstract)
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon, Arpita Patra
TCC (2)2
2019 Sampling Graphs without Forbidden Subgraphs and Unbalanced Expanders with Negligible Error
abstract
Suppose that you wish to sample a random graph G over n vertices and m edges conditioned on the event that G does not contain a “small" t-size graph H (e.g., clique) as a subgraph. Assuming that most such graphs are H-free, the problem can be solved by a simple rejected-sampling algorithm (that tests for t-cliques) with an expected running time of nO(t). Is it possible to solve the problem in running time that does not grow polynomially with nt? In this paper, we introduce the general problem of sampling a “random looking'' graph G with a given edge density that avoids some arbitrary predefined t-size subgraph H. As our main result, we show that the problem is solvable with respect to some specially crafted k-wise independent distribution over graphs. That is, we design a sampling algorithm for k-wise independent graphs that supports efficient testing for subgraph-freeness in time f(t) · ncwhere f is a function of t and the constant c in the exponent is independent of t. Our solution extends to the case where both G and H are d-uniform hypergraphs. We use these algorithms to obtain the first probabilistic construction of constant-degree polynomially-unbalanced expander graphs whose failure probability is negligible in n (i.e., n-ω(1)). In particular, given constants d>c, we output a bipartite graph that has n left nodes, ncright nodes with right-degree of d so that any right set of size at most nΩ(1)expands by factor of Ω(d). This result is extended to the setting of unique expansion as well. We observe that such a negligible-error construction can be employed in many useful settings, and present applications in coding theory (batch codes and LDPC codes), pseudorandomness (low-bias generators and randomness extractors) and cryptography. Notably, we show that our constructions yield a collection of polynomial-stretch locally-computable cryptographic pseudorandom generators based on Goldreich's one-wayness assumption resolving a central open problem in parallel-cryptography (cf., Applebaum-Ishai-Kushilevitz, FOCS 2004; and Ishai-Kushilevitz-Ostrovsky-Sahai, STOC 2008).
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon
FOCS2