Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Duo Chai

dblp:235/2046 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 39% Information extraction and text analysis · 36% Reinforcement learning · 20%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
description-based classification
0.412020
Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning
description generation
0.412020
Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.412020
Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.412020
Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.412019
Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › interactive question answering
conversational question answering
0.112019
Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering · ACL (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.4abstractive and extractive summarization · 0.4machine reading comprehension · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning
abstract
The task of text classification is usually divided into two stages: text feature extraction and classification. In this standard formalization, categories are merely represented as indexes in the label vocabulary, and the model lacks for explicit instructions on what to classify. Inspired by the current trend of formalizing NLP problems as question answering tasks, we propose a new framework for text classification, in which each category label is associated with a category description. Descriptions are generated by hand-crafted templates or using abstractive/extractive models from reinforcement learning. The concatenation of the description and the text is fed to the classifier to decide whether or not the current label should be assigned to the text. The proposed strategy forces the model to attend to the most salient texts with respect to the label, which can be regarded as a hard version of attention, leading to better performances. We observe significant performance boosts over strong baselines on a wide range of text classification tasks including single-label classification, multi-label classification and multi-aspect sentiment analysis.
Duo Chai, Wei Wu 0044, Qinghong Han, Fei Wu 0001, Jiwei Li 0001
ICML1
2019 Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering
abstract
In this paper, we propose a new paradigm for the task of entity-relation extraction.We cast the task as a multi-turn question answering problem, i.e., the extraction of entities and relations is transformed to the task of identifying answer spans from the context.This multi-turn QA formalization comes with several key advantages: firstly, the question query encodes important information for the entity/relation class we want to identify; secondly, QA provides a natural way of jointly modeling entity and relation; and thirdly, it allows us to exploit the well developed machine reading comprehension (MRC) models.Experiments on the ACE and the CoNLL04 corpora demonstrate that the proposed paradigm significantly outperforms previous best models.We are able to obtain the stateof-the-art results on all of the ACE04, ACE05 and CoNLL04 datasets, increasing the SOTA results on the three datasets to 49.4 (+1.0), 60.2 (+0.6) and 68.9 (+2.1), respectively.Additionally, we construct a newly developed dataset RESUME in Chinese, which requires multi-step reasoning to construct entity dependencies, as opposed to the single-step dependency extraction in the triplet exaction in previous datasets.The proposed multi-turn QA model also achieves the best performance on the RESUME dataset. 1
Xiaoya Li 0001, Fan Yin, Zijun Sun, Xiayu Li, Arianna Yuan, Duo Chai, Mingxin Zhou, Jiwei Li 0001
ACL (1)6