Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Duo Chai
dblp:235/2046
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 39% Information extraction and text analysis · 36% Reinforcement learning · 20% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
description-based classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning
description generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › interactive question answering
conversational question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering · ACL (1) 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.4abstractive and extractive summarization · 0.4machine reading comprehension · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement LearningabstractThe task of text classification is usually divided into two stages: text feature extraction and classification. In this standard formalization, categories are merely represented as indexes in the label vocabulary, and the model lacks for explicit instructions on what to classify. Inspired by the current trend of formalizing NLP problems as question answering tasks, we propose a new framework for text classification, in which each category label is associated with a category description. Descriptions are generated by hand-crafted templates or using abstractive/extractive models from reinforcement learning. The concatenation of the description and the text is fed to the classifier to decide whether or not the current label should be assigned to the text. The proposed strategy forces the model to attend to the most salient texts with respect to the label, which can be regarded as a hard version of attention, leading to better performances. We observe significant performance boosts over strong baselines on a wide range of text classification tasks including single-label classification, multi-label classification and multi-aspect sentiment analysis. Duo Chai, Wei Wu 0044, Qinghong Han, Fei Wu 0001, Jiwei Li 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question AnsweringabstractIn this paper, we propose a new paradigm for the task of entity-relation extraction.We cast the task as a multi-turn question answering problem, i.e., the extraction of entities and relations is transformed to the task of identifying answer spans from the context.This multi-turn QA formalization comes with several key advantages: firstly, the question query encodes important information for the entity/relation class we want to identify; secondly, QA provides a natural way of jointly modeling entity and relation; and thirdly, it allows us to exploit the well developed machine reading comprehension (MRC) models.Experiments on the ACE and the CoNLL04 corpora demonstrate that the proposed paradigm significantly outperforms previous best models.We are able to obtain the stateof-the-art results on all of the ACE04, ACE05 and CoNLL04 datasets, increasing the SOTA results on the three datasets to 49.4 (+1.0), 60.2 (+0.6) and 68.9 (+2.1), respectively.Additionally, we construct a newly developed dataset RESUME in Chinese, which requires multi-step reasoning to construct entity dependencies, as opposed to the single-step dependency extraction in the triplet exaction in previous datasets.The proposed multi-turn QA model also achieves the best performance on the RESUME dataset. 1 Xiaoya Li 0001, Fan Yin, Zijun Sun, Xiayu Li, Arianna Yuan, Duo Chai, Mingxin Zhou, Jiwei Li 0001 |
ACL (1) | 6 |