Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Reichle
dblp:235/4706
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
1as first author
18since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3498-5472ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 18 · 1 first-author · 18 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
14 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 80% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 20% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
5.8 | 7 | 2026 | Lattice-Based Threshold Blind Signatures · SP 2026 Unmasking TRaccoon: A Lattice-Based Threshold Signature with An Efficient Identifiable Abort Protocol · CRYPTO (6) 2025 Blind Signatures from Proofs of Inequality · CRYPTO (6) 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
blind signatures |
4.9 | 6 | 2026 | Lattice-Based Threshold Blind Signatures · SP 2026 Blind Signatures from Proofs of Inequality · CRYPTO (6) 2025 Tightly-Secure Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free Groups · ASIACRYPT (6) 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
threshold signature |
2.6 | 3 | 2026 | Adaptively-Secure Three-Round Threshold Schnorr from DL · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026 Unmasking TRaccoon: A Lattice-Based Threshold Signature with An Efficient Identifiable Abort Protocol · CRYPTO (6) 2025 Adaptively Secure 5 Round Threshold Signatures from MLWE/MSIS and DL with Rewinding · CRYPTO (7) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs |
1.9 | 3 | 2025 | Blind Signatures from Proofs of Inequality · CRYPTO (6) 2025 Sharp: Short Relaxed Range Proofs · CCS 2022 Efficient Range Proofs with Transparent Setup from Bounded Integer Commitments · EUROCRYPT (3) 2021 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › searchable encryption
searchable symmetric encryption |
1.7 | 3 | 2023 | Hermes: I/O-Efficient Forward-Secure Searchable Symmetric Encryption · ASIACRYPT (6) 2023 Dynamic Local Searchable Symmetric Encryption · CRYPTO (4) 2022 SSE and SSD: Page-Efficient Searchable Symmetric Encryption · CRYPTO (3) 2021 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | Lattice-Based Threshold Blind Signatures · SP 2026 Adaptively Secure 5 Round Threshold Signatures from MLWE/MSIS and DL with Rewinding · CRYPTO (7) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | Lattice-Based Threshold Blind Signatures · SP 2026 Adaptively Secure 5 Round Threshold Signatures from MLWE/MSIS and DL with Rewinding · CRYPTO (7) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
commitment schemes |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Sharp: Short Relaxed Range Proofs · CCS 2022 Efficient Range Proofs with Transparent Setup from Bounded Integer Commitments · EUROCRYPT (3) 2021 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs › zero-knowledge set membership proof
range proof |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Sharp: Short Relaxed Range Proofs · CCS 2022 Efficient Range Proofs with Transparent Setup from Bounded Integer Commitments · EUROCRYPT (3) 2021 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
adaptive security |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Adaptively-Secure Three-Round Threshold Schnorr from DL · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › blind signatures
threshold blind signatures |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Lattice-Based Threshold Blind Signatures · SP 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › threshold signature
threshold schnorr signature |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Adaptively-Secure Three-Round Threshold Schnorr from DL · EUROCRYPT (1) 2026 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
pairing-free groups |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tightly-Secure Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free Groups · ASIACRYPT (6) 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
tight security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tightly-Secure Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free Groups · ASIACRYPT (6) 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security › security notions
forward security |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Hermes: I/O-Efficient Forward-Secure Searchable Symmetric Encryption · ASIACRYPT (6) 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › blind signatures
round-optimal blind signatures |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Practical Round-Optimal Blind Signatures in the ROM from Standard Assumptions · ASIACRYPT (2) 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › searchable encryption › searchable symmetric encryption
dynamic searchable symmetric encryption |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Local Searchable Symmetric Encryption · CRYPTO (4) 2022 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › commitment schemes
vector commitment |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sharp: Short Relaxed Range Proofs · CCS 2022 |
Storage systems › secure storage
encrypted storage |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Local Searchable Symmetric Encryption · CRYPTO (4) 2022 |
Storage systems
flash and SSD |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | SSE and SSD: Page-Efficient Searchable Symmetric Encryption · CRYPTO (3) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random oracle model · 1.5lattice-based construction · 1.0zero-knowledge proofs · 0.9proof of inequality · 0.9non-interactive zero-knowledge proof · 0.9standard assumptions · 0.7sigma protocols · 0.6hidden order group · 0.6discrete logarithm · 0.6batching · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Playing Tag with Okamoto-Schnorr: Three-Move Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from DDH
Rutchathon Chairattana-Apirom, Michael Reichle, Stefano Tessaro |
CRYPTO (7) | 2 |
| 2026 | Blind Signatures from Arguments of Inequality
Michael Klooß, Russell W. F. Lai, Michael Reichle |
CRYPTO (7) | 3 |
| 2026 | Adaptively-Secure Three-Round Threshold Schnorr from DL
Guilhem Niot, Michael Reichle, Kaoru Takemure |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 2 |
| 2026 | Threshold Blind Signatures from CDH
Michael Reichle, Zoé Reinke |
PKC (1) | 1 |
| 2026 | Lattice-Based Threshold Blind SignaturesabstractInternational audience Sebastian Faller, Guilhem Niot, Michael Reichle |
SP | 3 |
| 2025 | Tightly-Secure Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free GroupsabstractWe construct the first blind signature scheme that achieves all of the following properties simultaneously: The third property enables a reasonably efficient solution, and in fact signatures in our scheme comprise 10 group elements and 29 $$\mathbb {Z} _p$$ -elements. Our scheme starts from a pairing-based non-blind signature scheme (Abe et al., JoC 2023), and uses recent techniques of Chairattana-Apirom, Tessaro, and Zhu (CRYPTO 2024) to replace the pairings used in this scheme with non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs in the random oracle model. This conversion is not generic or straightforward (also because prior works have converted only significantly simpler signature schemes), and we are required to improve upon and innovate existing techniques in several places. As an interesting side note, and unlike previous works, our techniques only require a non-programmable random oracle, and our signature scheme achieves predicate blindness (which means that the user can prove statements about the signed message during the signing process). Nicholas Brandt, Dennis Hofheinz, Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle |
ASIACRYPT (6) | 4 |
| 2025 | Blind Signatures from Proofs of Inequality
Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle |
CRYPTO (6) | 2 |
| 2025 | Unmasking TRaccoon: A Lattice-Based Threshold Signature with An Efficient Identifiable Abort Protocol
Rafaël Del Pino, Shuichi Katsumata, Guilhem Niot, Michael Reichle, Kaoru Takemure |
CRYPTO (6) | 4 |
| 2025 | Security Amplification of Threshold Signatures in the Standard Model
Karen Azari, Cecilia Boschini, Kristina Hostáková, Michael Reichle |
TCC (3) | 4 |
| 2024 | Practical Blind Signatures in Pairing-Free Groups
Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle, Benedikt Wagner |
ASIACRYPT (1) | 2 |
| 2024 | Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from Standard Assumptions in the ROM
Julia Kastner 0001, Ky Nguyen, Michael Reichle |
CRYPTO (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | Adaptively Secure 5 Round Threshold Signatures from MLWE/MSIS and DL with Rewinding
Shuichi Katsumata, Michael Reichle, Kaoru Takemure |
CRYPTO (7) | 2 |
| 2023 | Practical Round-Optimal Blind Signatures in the ROM from Standard Assumptions
Shuichi Katsumata, Michael Reichle, Yusuke Sakai 0001 |
ASIACRYPT (2) | 2 |
| 2023 | Hermes: I/O-Efficient Forward-Secure Searchable Symmetric Encryption
Brice Minaud, Michael Reichle |
ASIACRYPT (6) | 2 |
| 2022 | Sharp: Short Relaxed Range ProofsabstractWe provide optimized range proofs, called Sharp, in discrete logarithm and hidden order groups, based on square decomposition. In the former setting, we build on the paradigm of Couteau et al. (Eurocrypt '21) and optimize their range proof (from now on, CKLR) in several ways: (1) We introduce batching via vector commitments and an adapted ∑;-protocol. (2) We introduce a new group switching strategy to reduce communication. (3) As repetitions are necessary to instantiate CKLR in standard groups, we provide a novel batch shortness test that allows for cheaper repetitions. The analysis of our test is nontrivial and forms a core technical contribution of our work. For example, for λ = 128 bit security and B = 64 bit ranges for N = 1 (resp. N = 8) proof(s), we reduce the proof size by 34% (resp. 75%) in arbitrary groups, and by 66% (resp. 88%) in groups of order 256-bit, compared to CKLR. Geoffroy Couteau, Dahmun Goudarzi, Michael Klooß, Michael Reichle |
CCS | 4 |
| 2022 | Dynamic Local Searchable Symmetric Encryption
Brice Minaud, Michael Reichle |
CRYPTO (4) | 2 |
| 2021 | SSE and SSD: Page-Efficient Searchable Symmetric Encryption
Angèle Bossuat, Raphael Bost, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Brice Minaud, Michael Reichle |
CRYPTO (3) | 5 |
| 2021 | Efficient Range Proofs with Transparent Setup from Bounded Integer Commitments
Geoffroy Couteau, Michael Klooß, Huang Lin, Michael Reichle |
EUROCRYPT (3) | 4 |