Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hyeyun Yang

dblp:236/0529 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5949-8673ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 64% Algorithms and data structures · 18% Mathematical optimization · 18%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry
geometric modeling and processing
1.012026
CG#Hunters Approach to Central Triangulation Under Parallel Flip Operations (CG Challenge) · SoCG 2026
Algorithms and data structures
heuristic algorithms
1.012026
CG#Hunters Approach to Central Triangulation Under Parallel Flip Operations (CG Challenge) · SoCG 2026
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
local search
1.012026
CG#Hunters Approach to Central Triangulation Under Parallel Flip Operations (CG Challenge) · SoCG 2026
Computational geometry
triangulation
1.012026
CG#Hunters Approach to Central Triangulation Under Parallel Flip Operations (CG Challenge) · SoCG 2026
Computational geometry › motion planning
coordinated motion planning
0.512021
A Simulated Annealing Approach to Coordinated Motion Planning (CG Challenge) · SoCG 2021
Computational geometry
motion planning
0.512021
A Simulated Annealing Approach to Coordinated Motion Planning (CG Challenge) · SoCG 2021
Computational geometry › motion planning
reconfiguration
0.512021
A Simulated Annealing Approach to Coordinated Motion Planning (CG Challenge) · SoCG 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representative sets · 1.0large neighborhood search · 1.0greedy edge selection · 1.0simulated annealing · 0.5hardness proof · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CG#Hunters Approach to Central Triangulation Under Parallel Flip Operations (CG Challenge)
abstract
In the CG:SHOP 2026 Challenge, the goal is to compute a central triangulation for a given set of triangulations on the same point set while minimizing the sum of parallel flip distances. To address the problem, our team (CG#Hunters) constructs an initial solution by iteratively applying parallel flips to reduce the total number of crossings between the triangulations until none remain. To optimize these solutions, we shorten the paths by using a score-based greedy edge selection and refine the central triangulation via a large scale neighborhood search. Additionally, a representative-set-based approach is utilized to efficiently handle large instances. With these combined approaches, we achieved third place by successfully computing central triangulations with sufficiently short parallel flip paths for all 250 instances.
Jaegun Lee, Seokyun Kang, Hyeyun Yang, Taehoon Ahn 0001
SoCG4
2021 A Simulated Annealing Approach to Coordinated Motion Planning (CG Challenge)
abstract
How can a set of identical mobile agents coordinate their motions to transform their arrangement from a given starting to a desired goal configuration? We consider this question in the context of actual physical devices called Catoms, which can perform reconfiguration, but need to maintain connectivity at all times to ensure communication and energy supply. We demonstrate and animate algorithmic results, in particular a proof of hardness, as well as an algorithm that guarantees constant stretch for certain classes of arrangements: If mapping the start configuration to the target configuration requires a maximum Manhattan distance of d, then the total duration of our overall schedule is in 𝒪(d), which is optimal up to constant factors.
Hyeyun Yang, Antoine Vigneron
SoCG1
2021 Matching sets of line segments
Hyeyun Yang, Antoine Vigneron
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2019 Matching Sets of Line Segments
Hyeyun Yang, Antoine Vigneron
WALCOM1