Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chilie Tan
dblp:236/9183
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 68% Video understanding and tracking · 32% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
natural language video localization |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Rethinking the Bottom-Up Framework for Query-Based Video Localization · AAAI 2020 DEBUG: A Dense Bottom-Up Grounding Approach for Natural Language Video Localization · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › video grounding
video re-localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Rethinking the Bottom-Up Framework for Query-Based Video Localization · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph convolution · 0.4feature pyramid network · 0.4dense bottom-up grounding · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Rethinking the Bottom-Up Framework for Query-Based Video LocalizationabstractIn this paper, we focus on the task query-based video localization, i.e., localizing a query in a long and untrimmed video. The prevailing solutions for this problem can be grouped into two categories: i) Top-down approach: It pre-cuts the video into a set of moment candidates, then it does classification and regression for each candidate; ii) Bottom-up approach: It injects the whole query content into each video frame, then it predicts the probabilities of each frame as a ground truth segment boundary (i.e., start or end). Both two frameworks have respective shortcomings: the top-down models suffer from heavy computations and they are sensitive to the heuristic rules, while the performance of bottom-up models is behind the performance of top-down counterpart thus far. However, we argue that the performance of bottom-up framework is severely underestimated by current unreasonable designs, including both the backbone and head network. To this end, we design a novel bottom-up model: Graph-FPN with Dense Predictions (GDP). For the backbone, GDP firstly generates a frame feature pyramid to capture multi-level semantics, then it utilizes graph convolution to encode the plentiful scene relationships, which incidentally mitigates the semantic gaps in the multi-scale feature pyramid. For the head network, GDP regards all frames falling in the ground truth segment as the foreground, and each foreground frame regresses the unique distances from its location to bi-directional boundaries. Extensive experiments on two challenging query-based video localization tasks (natural language video localization and video relocalization), involving four challenging benchmarks (TACoS, Charades-STA, ActivityNet Captions, and Activity-VRL), have shown that GDP surpasses the state-of-the-art top-down models. Long Chen 0016, Chujie Lu, Siliang Tang, Jun Xiao 0001, Chilie Tan |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2019 | DEBUG: A Dense Bottom-Up Grounding Approach for Natural Language Video LocalizationabstractChujie Lu, Long Chen, Chilie Tan, Xiaolin Li, Jun Xiao. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Chujie Lu, Long Chen 0016, Chilie Tan, Jun Xiao 0001 |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 3 |