Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julien Piet
dblp:237/0174
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-7447-0910ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
5 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 31% Systems and software security · 27% Network security · 15% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Language models and text generation · 39% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Network measurement and analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial defense
prompt injection defense |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Systems and software security
content moderation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Toxicity Detection for Free · NeurIPS 2024 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › privacy-preserving blockchain
mempool privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mempool Privacy via Batched Threshold Encryption: Attacks and Defenses · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption
threshold encryption |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mempool Privacy via Batched Threshold Encryption: Attacks and Defenses · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Systems and software security › content moderation
toxic content detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Toxicity Detection for Free · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
certified adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Asymmetric Certified Robustness via Feature-Convex Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Asymmetric Certified Robustness via Feature-Convex Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Network measurement and analytics
traffic classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | GGFAST: Automating Generation of Flexible Network Traffic Classifiers · SIGCOMM 2023 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Network Detection of Interactive SSH Impostors Using Deep Learning · USENIX Security Symposium 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model
large language model security |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial natural language processing
prompt injection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Network measurement and analytics
traffic analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Network Detection of Interactive SSH Impostors Using Deep Learning · USENIX Security Symposium 2023 |
Network security
traffic analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | GGFAST: Automating Generation of Flexible Network Traffic Classifiers · SIGCOMM 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt injection defense · 1.7sparse logistic regression · 1.5logit analysis · 1.5supervised machine learning · 1.3interpretable features · 1.3deep learning · 1.3structured query · 0.9structured queries · 0.9cryptanalysis · 0.8lipschitz continuity · 0.7input convex neural network · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries
Sizhe Chen, Julien Piet, Chawin Sitawarin, David A. Wagner 0001 |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |
| 2024 | Jatmo: Prompt Injection Defense by Task-Specific Finetuning
Julien Piet, Maha Alrashed, Chawin Sitawarin, Sizhe Chen, Zeming Wei, Elizabeth Sun, Basel Alomair, David A. Wagner 0001 |
ESORICS (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Toxicity Detection for FreeabstractCurrent LLMs are generally aligned to follow safety requirements and tend to refuse toxic prompts. However, LLMs can fail to refuse toxic prompts or be overcautious and refuse benign examples. In addition, state-of-the-art toxicity detectors have low TPRs at low FPR, incurring high costs in real-world applications where toxic examples are rare. In this paper, we introduce Moderation Using LLM Introspection (MULI), which detects toxic prompts using the information extracted directly from LLMs themselves. We found we can distinguish between benign and toxic prompts from the distribution of the first response token's logits. Using this idea, we build a robust detector of toxic prompts using a sparse logistic regression model on the first response token logits. Our scheme outperforms SOTA detectors under multiple metrics. Zhanhao Hu, Julien Piet, Geng Zhao 0002, Jiantao Jiao, David A. Wagner 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Mempool Privacy via Batched Threshold Encryption: Attacks and Defenses
Arka Rai Choudhuri, Sanjam Garg, Julien Piet, Guru-Vamsi Policharla |
USENIX Security Symposium | 3 |
| 2023 | MEVade: An MEV-Resistant Blockchain DesignabstractEthereum is a popular blockchain that facilitates the creation of decentralized applications (dApps) and enables digital transactions to be executed without the need for a central authority. However, as in traditional markets, information asymmetry and market inefficiencies are used to the detriment of ordinary users via trading strategies that exploit “Miner Extractable Value” (MEV). We propose two extensions of Ethereum, one for proof of work (PoW), and one for proof of stake (PoS), that eliminate most forms of MEV by randomizing the execution order of transactions and hiding the content of transactions until their inclusion in a block. We simulate attack scenarios for both settings and provide detailed security properties and proofs. Julien Piet, Vivek Nair, Sanjay Subramanian |
ICBC | 1 |
| 2023 | Asymmetric Certified Robustness via Feature-Convex Neural NetworksabstractReal-world adversarial attacks on machine learning models often feature an asymmetric structure wherein adversaries only attempt to induce false negatives (e.g., classify a spam email as not spam). We formalize the asymmetric robustness certification problem and correspondingly present the feature-convex neural network architecture, which composes an input-convex neural network (ICNN) with a Lipschitz continuous feature map in order to achieve asymmetric adversarial robustness. We consider the aforementioned binary setting with one "sensitive" class, and for this class we prove deterministic, closed-form, and easily-computable certified robust radii for arbitrary $\ell_p$-norms. We theoretically justify the use of these models by characterizing their decision region geometry, extending the universal approximation theorem for ICNN regression to the classification setting, and proving a lower bound on the probability that such models perfectly fit even unstructured uniformly distributed data in sufficiently high dimensions. Experiments on Malimg malware classification and subsets of the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 datasets show that feature-convex classifiers attain substantial certified $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$, and $\ell_{\infty}$-radii while being far more computationally efficient than competitive baselines. Samuel Pfrommer, Brendon G. Anderson, Julien Piet, Somayeh Sojoudi |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | GGFAST: Automating Generation of Flexible Network Traffic ClassifiersabstractWhen employing supervised machine learning to analyze network traffic, the heart of the task often lies in developing effective features for the ML to leverage. We develop GGFAST, a unified, automated framework that can build powerful classifiers for specific network traffic analysis tasks, built on interpretable features. The framework uses only packet sizes, directionality, and sequencing, facilitating analysis in a payload-agnostic fashion that remains applicable in the presence of encryption. Julien Piet, Dubem Nwoji, Vern Paxson |
SIGCOMM | 1 |
| 2023 | Network Detection of Interactive SSH Impostors Using Deep Learning
Julien Piet, Aashish Sharma, Vern Paxson, David A. Wagner 0001 |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |