Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maximus Mutschler

dblp:238/0922 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 75% Deep learning architectures and training · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate
0.412020
Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
line search
0.412020
Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.412020
Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization
0.412020
Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parabolic approximation · 0.4convergence analysis · 0.4conjugate gradient · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Empirically Explaining SGD from a Line Search Perspective
Maximus Mutschler, Andreas Zell
ICANN (2)1
2020 Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs
abstract
A major challenge in current optimization research for deep learning is to automatically find optimal step sizes for each update step. The optimal step size is closely related to the shape of the loss in the update step direction. However, this shape has not yet been examined in detail. This work shows empirically that the sample loss over lines in negative gradient direction is mostly convex and well suited for one-dimensional parabolic approximations. Exploiting this parabolic property we introduce a simple and robust line search approach, which performs loss-shape dependent update steps. Our approach combines well-known methods such as parabolic approximation, line search and conjugate gradient, to perform efficiently. It successfully competes with common and state-of-the-art optimization methods on a large variety of experiments without the need of hand-designed step size schedules. Thus, it is of interest for objectives where step-size schedules are unknown or do not perform well. Our excessive evaluation includes multiple comprehensive hyperparameter grid searches on several datasets and architectures. We provide proof of convergence for an adapted scenario. Finally, we give a general investigation of exact line searches in the context of sample losses and exact losses, including their relation to our line search approach.
Maximus Mutschler, Andreas Zell
NeurIPS1