Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maximus Mutschler
dblp:238/0922
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 75% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
line search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parabolic approximation · 0.4convergence analysis · 0.4conjugate gradient · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Empirically Explaining SGD from a Line Search Perspective
Maximus Mutschler, Andreas Zell |
ICANN (2) | 1 |
| 2020 | Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNsabstractA major challenge in current optimization research for deep learning is to automatically find optimal step sizes for each update step. The optimal step size is closely related to the shape of the loss in the update step direction. However, this shape has not yet been examined in detail. This work shows empirically that the sample loss over lines in negative gradient direction is mostly convex and well suited for one-dimensional parabolic approximations. Exploiting this parabolic property we introduce a simple and robust line search approach, which performs loss-shape dependent update steps. Our approach combines well-known methods such as parabolic approximation, line search and conjugate gradient, to perform efficiently. It successfully competes with common and state-of-the-art optimization methods on a large variety of experiments without the need of hand-designed step size schedules. Thus, it is of interest for objectives where step-size schedules are unknown or do not perform well. Our excessive evaluation includes multiple comprehensive hyperparameter grid searches on several datasets and architectures. We provide proof of convergence for an adapted scenario. Finally, we give a general investigation of exact line searches in the context of sample losses and exact losses, including their relation to our line search approach. Maximus Mutschler, Andreas Zell |
NeurIPS | 1 |