Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abhishek Cauligi

dblp:238/1577 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
sequential convex programming
0.412019
GuSTO: Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization via Sequential Convex Programming · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.412019
GuSTO: Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization via Sequential Convex Programming · ICRA 2019
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.112019
GuSTO: Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization via Sequential Convex Programming · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential convex programming · 0.8indirect optimal control · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 GuSTO: Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization via Sequential Convex Programming
abstract
Sequential Convex Programming (SCP) has recently seen a surge of interest as a tool for trajectory optimization. However, most available methods lack rigorous performance guarantees and they are often tailored to specific optimal control setups. In this paper, we present GuSTO (Guaranteed Sequential Trajectory optimization), an algorithmic framework to solve trajectory optimization problems for control-affine systems with drift. GuSTO generalizes earlier SCP-based methods for trajectory optimization (by addressing, for example, goal-set constraints and problems with either fixed or free final time) and enjoys theoretical convergence guarantees in terms of convergence to, at least, a stationary point. The theoretical analysis is further leveraged to devise an accelerated implementation of GuSTO, which originally infuses ideas from indirect optimal control into an SCP context. Numerical experiments on a variety of trajectory optimization setups show that GuSTO generally outperforms current state-of-the-art approaches in terms of success rates, solution quality, and computation times.
Riccardo Bonalli, Abhishek Cauligi, Andrew Bylard, Marco Pavone 0001
ICRA2