Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingxi Yu
dblp:239/5431
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 29% Generative modeling · 29% Deep learning architectures and training · 29% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In-Context Compositional Learning vis Sparse Coding Transformer · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In-Context Compositional Learning vis Sparse Coding Transformer · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › personalized image generation
concept customization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Fine-Tuning of Transformers for Generative Tasks · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Fine-Tuning of Transformers for Generative Tasks · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
sparse fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Fine-Tuning of Transformers for Generative Tasks · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Fine-Tuning of Transformers for Generative Tasks · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In-Context Compositional Learning vis Sparse Coding Transformer · NeurIPS 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing
image editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Fine-Tuning of Transformers for Generative Tasks · ICCV 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
text-guided image editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Fine-Tuning of Transformers for Generative Tasks · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse coding · 2.6transformer fine-tuning · 1.7feature dictionary · 1.7dictionary learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sparse Fine-Tuning of Transformers for Generative TasksabstractLarge pre-trained transformers have revolutionized artificial intelligence across various domains, and fine-tuning remains the dominant approach for adapting these models to downstream tasks due to the cost of training from scratch. However, in existing fine-tuning methods, the updated representations are formed as a dense combination of modified parameters, making it challenging to interpret their contributions and understand how the model adapts to new tasks. In this work, we introduce a fine-tuning framework inspired by sparse coding, where fine-tuned features are represented as a sparse combination of basic elements, i.e., feature dictionary atoms. The feature dictionary atoms function as fundamental building blocks of the representation, and tuning atoms allows for seamless adaptation to downstream tasks. Sparse coefficients then serve as indicators of atom importance, identifying the contribution of each atom to the updated representation. Leveraging the atom selection capability of sparse coefficients, we first demonstrate that our method enhances image editing performance by improving text alignment through the removal of unimportant feature dictionary atoms. Additionally, we validate the effectiveness of our approach in the text-to-image concept customization task, where our method efficiently constructs the target concept using a sparse combination of feature dictionary atoms, outperforming various baseline fine-tuning methods. Wei Chen 0124, Jingxi Yu, Zichen Miao, Qiang Qiu 0001 |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2025 | In-Context Compositional Learning vis Sparse Coding TransformerabstractRecent advances in AI, driven by Transformer architectures, have achieved remarkable success in language, vision, and multimodal reasoning, and there is growing demand for them to address in-context compositional learning tasks. In these tasks, models solve the target problems by inferring compositional rules from context examples, which are composed of basic components structured by underlying rules. However, some of these tasks remain challenging for Transformers, which are not inherently designed to handle compositional tasks and offer limited structural inductive bias.
Inspired by sparse coding, we propose a reformulation of the attention to enhance its capability for compositional tasks. In sparse coding, data are represented as sparse combinations of basic elements, with the resulting coefficients capturing the underlying compositional structure of the input.
Specifically, we reinterpret the standard attention block as projecting inputs into outputs through projections onto two sets of learned dictionary atoms: an *encoding dictionary* and a *decoding dictionary*. The encoding dictionary decomposes the input into a set of coefficients, which represent the compositional structure of the input. To enhance structured representations, we impose sparsity on these coefficients. The sparse coefficients are then used to linearly combine the decoding dictionary atoms to generate the output. Furthermore, to assist compositional generalization tasks, we propose estimating the coefficients of the target problem as a linear combination of the coefficients obtained from the context examples.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on the S-RAVEN and RAVEN datasets. For certain compositional generalization tasks, our method maintains performance even when standard Transformers fail, owing to its ability to learn and apply compositional rules. Wei Chen 0124, Jingxi Yu, Zichen Miao, Qiang Qiu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |