Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Angela Carey Lin

dblp:239/7889 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 53% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 32% Wearable and physiological sensing · 16%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
deaf and hard of hearing technology
0.412019
Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Individuals' Preferences for Wearable and Mobile Sound Awareness Technologies · CHI 2019
Haptics and multimodal interaction › multimodal interaction
multimodal output
0.112019
Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Individuals' Preferences for Wearable and Mobile Sound Awareness Technologies · CHI 2019
Haptics and multimodal interaction › multimodal feedback
visuo-haptic feedback
0.112019
Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Individuals' Preferences for Wearable and Mobile Sound Awareness Technologies · CHI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online survey · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Individuals' Preferences for Wearable and Mobile Sound Awareness Technologies
abstract
To investigate preferences for mobile and wearable sound awareness systems, we conducted an online survey with 201 DHH participants. The survey explores how demographic factors affect perceptions of sound awareness technologies, gauges interest in specific sounds and sound characteristics, solicits reactions to three design scenarios (smartphone, smartwatch, head-mounted display) and two output modalities (visual, haptic), and probes issues related to social context of use. While most participants were highly interested in being aware of sounds, this interest was modulated by communication preference--that is, for sign or oral communication or both. Almost all participants wanted both visual and haptic feedback and 75% preferred to have that feedback on separate devices (e.g., haptic on smartwatch, visual on head-mounted display). Other findings related to sound type, full captions vs. keywords, sound filtering, notification styles, and social context provide direct guidance for the design of future mobile and wearable sound awareness systems.
Leah Findlater, Bonnie Chinh, Dhruv Jain, Jon Froehlich, Raja S. Kushalnagar, Angela Carey Lin
CHI6