Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonas Kjeldmand Jensen
dblp:239/8191
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0009-0003-0329-7030ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 44% Design research and methods · 44% User interface design and tools · 13% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces › digital fabrication
augmented fabrication |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Barriers to End-User Designers of Augmented Fabrication · CHI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Barriers to End-User Designers of Augmented FabricationabstractAugmented fabrication is the practice of designing and fabricating an artifact to work with existing objects. Although common both in the wild and as an area for research tools, little is known about how novices approach the task of designing under the constraints of interfacing with real-world objects. In this paper, we report the results of a study of fifteen novice end users in an augmented fabrication design task. We discuss obstacles encountered in four contexts: capturing information about physical objects, transferring information to 3D~modeling software, digitally modeling a new object, and evaluating whether the new object will work when fabricated. Based on our findings, we suggest how future tools can better support augmented fabrication in each of these contexts. Chandan Mahapatra, Jonas Kjeldmand Jensen, Michael McQuaid, Daniel Ashbrook |
CHI | 2 |
| 2019 | Into Scandinavia: When Online Fatherhood Reflects Societal InfrastructuresabstractDenmark is a generous welfare state which provides resources and legal means for fathers to take their parental role seriously and engage with their children. In this paper, we explore the relation between Danish fathers' interaction online and the societal, legal, and economic infrastructures in which they are situated. By focusing on how fathers living in Denmark make use of the Internet and social media sites to facilitate their role as parents, we are able to explore how online engagement is shaped by the different societal 'norms' of parenting. Our research outlines the ways in which societal infrastructures influence how fathers perceive, and subsequently make use of social media in relation to child-caring. We find that fathers discuss their experiences of legal inequities and stereotypical discrimination on social network sites like Facebook. We also study fathers' online reviews of a Danish parenting App, FAR, designed specifically to support fathers. By analyzing social media discussions around fatherhood in Denmark, we found connections to the ways in which the current political climate shapes and influences fatherhood in Denmark, as they reflect the societal infrastructures which situate fathers in contemporary Denmark. Further, we found a strong political interest for collective action to transform the societal infrastructures to support legal equality for child caretaking across genders. This strong political motivation is distinct from existing studies exploring how fatherhood is displayed on social media in other countries such as the USA. On this basis, we argue that research exploring social media use in institutions which are strongly shaped by societal norms, must explicitly consider the role which society takes in shaping such institutions, and include these aspects into the analysis. Our data show that fathers use social media sites as platforms to produce a fatherhood more in line with their lived experience of parenting, and that they advocate for collective political action to strengthen fathers' legal rights. Jonas Kjeldmand Jensen, Tawfiq Ammari, Pernille Bjørn |
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. | 1 |