Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Suhit Kodgule

dblp:239/8630 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 50% Reinforcement learning · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
autonomous exploration
0.412020
Planetary Rover Exploration Combining Remote and In Situ Measurements for Active Spectroscopic Mapping · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › space robotics
planetary rover exploration
0.412020
Planetary Rover Exploration Combining Remote and In Situ Measurements for Active Spectroscopic Mapping · ICRA 2020
Machine learning and data management
data management for machine learning
0.112020
Planetary Rover Exploration Combining Remote and In Situ Measurements for Active Spectroscopic Mapping · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-myopic path planning · 0.9machine learning · 0.9information theory · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Planetary Rover Exploration Combining Remote and In Situ Measurements for Active Spectroscopic Mapping
abstract
Maintaining high levels of productivity for planetary rover missions is very difficult due to limited communication and heavy reliance on ground control. There is a need for autonomy that enables more adaptive and efficient actions based on real-time information. This paper presents an autonomous mapping and exploration approach for planetary rovers. We first describe a machine learning model that actively combines remote and rover measurements for mapping. We focus on spectroscopic data because they are commonly used to investigate surface composition. We then incorporate notions from information theory and non-myopic path planning to improve exploration productivity. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility and successful performance of our approach via spectroscopic investigations of Cuprite, Nevada; a well-studied region of mineralogical and geological interest. We first perform a detailed analysis in simulations, and then validate those results with an actual rover in the field in Nevada.
Alberto Candela, Suhit Kodgule, Kevin Edelson, Srinivasan Vijayarangan, David R. Thompson 0001, Eldar Noe Dobrea, David Wettergreen
ICRA2
2019 Non-myopic Planetary Exploration Combining In Situ and Remote Measurements
abstract
Remote sensing measurements can provide crucial information about the material properties of a planetary surface but their application is limited by their spatial resolution, typically tens of meters per pixel, when constituent materials are mixed at much finer scale. Consequently the orbital observations must be validated with in situ measurements from a spectrometer on the ground. In planetary exploration this means that a rover must visit selected locations that jointly improve a model of the environment and satisfy mobility and sampling constraints. Conventional planning methods used in this situation follow sub-optimal greedy strategies that are not scalable to large areas. We show how the problem can be effectively defined in a Markov Decision Process framework and propose a planning algorithm based on Monte Carlo Tree Search, which is efficient but devoid of these drawbacks thereby providing superior performance. We evaluate our approach using hyperspectral imagery of a well-studied geologic site in Cuprite, Nevada.
Suhit Kodgule, Alberto Candela, David Wettergreen
IROS1