Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tingyu Song
dblp:239/8878
· DBLP profile ↗
in reviewer pool
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-3563-1377ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 61% Vision and language · 30% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 9% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 88% Visual content generation and editing · 12% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › document retrieval
reasoning-intensive retrieval |
2.9 | 3 | 2026 | Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026 A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and Challenges · ACL (1) 2026 LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image retrieval
composed image retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Rethinking Composed Image Retrieval Evaluation: A Fine-Grained Benchmark from Image Editing · ACL (1) 2026 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Rethinking Composed Image Retrieval Evaluation: A Fine-Grained Benchmark from Image Editing · ACL (1) 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videos · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videos · ACL (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval
reranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval
agentic search |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval › multi-stage retrieval
retrieval and reranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and Challenges · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking · EMNLP 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing
video generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videos · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 1.7re-prompt pipeline · 1.7multimodal large language model · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7synthetic corpus generation · 1.0large language model · 1.0image editing · 1.0hard negatives · 1.0LoRA fine-tuning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Rethinking Composed Image Retrieval Evaluation: A Fine-Grained Benchmark from Image EditingabstractTingyu Song, Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Zhuoning Guo, Dingkun Long, Pengjun Xie, Siyue Zhang, Yilun Zhao, Shu Wu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Tingyu Song, Yanzhao Zhang, Zhuoning Guo, Dingkun Long, Pengjun Xie, Siyue Zhang, Yilun Zhao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2026 | A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and ChallengesabstractReasoning-Intensive Retrieval (RIR) targets retrieval settings where relevance is mediated by latent inferential links between a query and supporting evidence, rather than semantic similarity.Motivated by the emergent reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent work integrates these capabilities into the IR field, spanning the entire pipeline from benchmarks to retrievers and rerankers.Despite this progress, the field lacks a systematic framework to organize current efforts and articulate a clear path forward.To provide a clear roadmap for this rapidly growing yet fragmented area, this survey (1) systematizes existing RIR benchmarks by knowledge domains and modalities, providing a detailed analysis of the current landscape; (2) introduces a structured taxonomy that categorizes methods based on where and how reasoning is integrated into the retrieval pipeline, alongside an analysis of their tradeoffs and practical applications; and (3) summarizes challenges and future directions to guide research in this evolving field. Yiyang Wei, Tingyu Song, Siyue Zhang, Yilun Zhao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2026 | Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search SystemsabstractReasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity.This capability is increasingly important for agentic search systems, where retrievers must provide complementary evidence across iterative search and synthesis.However, existing work remains limited on both evaluation and training: benchmarks such as BRIGHT provide narrow gold sets and evaluate retrievers in isolation, while synthetic training corpora often optimize single-passage relevance rather than evidence portfolio construction.We introduce BRIGHT-PRO, an expert-annotated benchmark that expands each query with multi-aspect gold evidence and evaluates retrievers under both static and agentic search protocols.We further construct RTriever-Synth, an aspect-decomposed synthetic corpus that generates complementary positives and positive-conditioned hard negatives, and use it to LoRA fine-tune RTriever-4B from Qwen3-Embedding-4B.Experiments across lexical, general-purpose, and reasoningintensive retrievers show that aspect-aware and agentic evaluation expose behaviors hidden by standard metrics, while RTriever-4B substantially improves over its base model. Yilun Zhao 0001, Jinbiao Wei, Tingyu Song, Siyue Zhang, Chen Zhao 0013, Arman Cohan |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC VideosabstractRecently, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have been extensively explored in video question answering. However, most existing assessments focus on natural videos, overlooking synthetic videos (e.g., AI-generated content). Meanwhile, some works in video generation rely on MLLMs to evaluate the quality of generated videos, but the capabilities of MLLMs on AIGC videos remain largely underexplored. To address this, we propose a new benchmark, VQ-Eval, which introduces four tasks—coherence validation, error awareness, error type detection, and reasoning evaluation—to comprehensively evaluate the abilities of MLLMs on AIGC videos. We evaluate 13 frontier MLLMs on VQ-Eval and find that even the best-performing model, GPT-4.1, struggles to achieve consistently good performance across all tasks. This highlights the challenging nature of our benchmark. Additionally, to investigate the practical applications of VQ-Eval in improving video generation, we design a re-prompt pipeline, demonstrating that aligning MLLMs more closely with human feedback can benefit the video generation. Tingyu Song, Tongyan Hu, Guo Gan, Yilun Zhao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information RerankingabstractExisting approaches typically rely on largescale fine-tuning to adapt LLMs for information reranking tasks, which is computationally expensive.In this work, we demonstrate that modern LLMs can be effectively adapted using only minimal, high-quality supervision.To enable this, we design LIMRANK-SYNTHESIZER, a reusable and open-source pipeline for generating diverse, challenging, and realistic reranking examples.Using this synthetic data, we finetune our reranker model, LIMRANK.We evaluate LIMRANK on two challenging benchmarks, i.e., BRIGHT for reasoning-intensive retrieval and FOLLOWIR for instruction-following retrieval.Our experiments demonstrate that LIMRANK achieves competitive performance, while being trained on less than 5% of the data typically used in prior work.Further ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of LIMRANK-SYNTHESIZER and the strong generalization capabilities of LIMRANK across downstream tasks, including scientific literature search and retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive problem solving. yale-nlp/LimRank Tingyu Song, Yilun Zhao 0001, Siyue Zhang, Chen Zhao 0013, Arman Cohan |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | IFIR: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Instruction-Following in Expert-Domain Information RetrievalabstractTingyu Song, Guo Gan, Mingsheng Shang, Yilun Zhao. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Tingyu Song, Guo Gan, Mingsheng Shang 0001, Yilun Zhao 0001 |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 1 |