Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Almqvist
dblp:239/9441
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9196-2026ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Design research and methods · 56% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Design research and methods › design practice
placemaking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Different Together: Design for Radical Placemaking · CHI 2023 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
urban computing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Different Together: Design for Radical Placemaking · CHI 2023 |
Design research and methods
critical design |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Different Together: Design for Radical Placemaking · CHI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prototyping · 0.7critical theory · 0.7autoethnography · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Different Together: Design for Radical PlacemakingabstractThis work responds to isolating urban places, and contributes new ways for thinking about placemaking. Progressing through autoethnography and prototyping, we critique design proposals with Lefebvre’s theory of utopia. There inhabitants can enjoy and shape their place together without risking depletion of their abilities and motivations to do so. The critique produces political sensibilities that help us make sense of common tensions among inhabitants, landowners, and visitors, and generate possible responses. The critique process itself illustrates how designing through critique with theory can help us think in new ways. This paper contributes a display of how design with critical theory can happen, ultimately to support our abilities and motivations to envision and make places of social flourishing that can respond to our socio-environmental crises. Andreas Almqvist, Anders Hedman, Adrian K. Clear, Rob Comber |
CHI | 1 |