Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Almqvist

dblp:239/9441 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9196-2026ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 56% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods › design practice
placemaking
0.712023
Different Together: Design for Radical Placemaking · CHI 2023
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
urban computing
0.712023
Different Together: Design for Radical Placemaking · CHI 2023
Design research and methods
critical design
0.212023
Different Together: Design for Radical Placemaking · CHI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prototyping · 0.7critical theory · 0.7autoethnography · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Different Together: Design for Radical Placemaking
abstract
This work responds to isolating urban places, and contributes new ways for thinking about placemaking. Progressing through autoethnography and prototyping, we critique design proposals with Lefebvre’s theory of utopia. There inhabitants can enjoy and shape their place together without risking depletion of their abilities and motivations to do so. The critique produces political sensibilities that help us make sense of common tensions among inhabitants, landowners, and visitors, and generate possible responses. The critique process itself illustrates how designing through critique with theory can help us think in new ways. This paper contributes a display of how design with critical theory can happen, ultimately to support our abilities and motivations to envision and make places of social flourishing that can respond to our socio-environmental crises.
Andreas Almqvist, Anders Hedman, Adrian K. Clear, Rob Comber
CHI1