Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xin Chen 0036
dblp:24/1518-36
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-1357-3970ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improve Single-Point Zeroth-Order Optimization Using High-Pass and Low-Pass Filters · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improve Single-Point Zeroth-Order Optimization Using High-Pass and Low-Pass Filters · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization › online convex optimization
dynamic regret |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online optimal control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
online optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
receding horizon control |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret Analysis · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
receding horizon control · 0.8gradient computation · 0.8momentum methods · 0.6low-pass filter · 0.6high-pass filter · 0.6extremum seeking control · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Improve Single-Point Zeroth-Order Optimization Using High-Pass and Low-Pass FiltersabstractSingle-point zeroth-order optimization (SZO) is useful in solving online black-box optimization and control problems in time-varying environments, as it queries the function value only once at each time step. However, the vanilla SZO method is known to suffer from a large estimation variance and slow convergence, which seriously limits its practical application. In this work, we borrow the idea of high-pass and low-pass filters from extremum seeking control (continuous-time version of SZO) and develop a novel SZO method called HLF-SZO by integrating these filters. It turns out that the high-pass filter coincides with the residual feedback method, and the low-pass filter can be interpreted as the momentum method. As a result, the proposed HLF-SZO achieves a much smaller variance and much faster convergence than the vanilla SZO method, and empirically outperforms the residual-feedback SZO method, which are verified via extensive numerical experiments. Xin Chen 0036, Yujie Tang 0002, Na Li 0002 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Online Optimal Control with Linear Dynamics and Predictions: Algorithms and Regret AnalysisabstractThis paper studies the online optimal control problem with time-varying convex stage costs for a time-invariant linear dynamical system, where a finite lookahead window of accurate predictions of the stage costs are available at each time. We design online algorithms, Receding Horizon Gradient-based Control (RHGC), that utilize the predictions through finite steps of gradient computations. We study the algorithm performance measured by dynamic regret: the online performance minus the optimal performance in hindsight. It is shown that the dynamic regret of RHGC decays exponentially with the size of the lookahead window. In addition, we provide a fundamental limit of the dynamic regret for any online algorithms by considering linear quadratic tracking problems. The regret upper bound of one RHGC method almost reaches the fundamental limit, demonstrating the effectiveness of the algorithm. Finally, we numerically test our algorithms for both linear and nonlinear systems to show the effectiveness and generality of our RHGC. Yingying Li 0005, Xin Chen 0036, Na Li 0002 |
NeurIPS | 2 |