Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jae-Hun Kim
dblp:24/1913
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing › music information retrieval
musical instrument recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Predominant Instrument Recognition in Polyphonic Music · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017 |
Audio and music processing
music information retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Predominant Instrument Recognition in Polyphonic Music · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Predominant Instrument Recognition in Polyphonic Music · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sliding window aggregation · 0.6max pooling · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)abstractIn this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://medicaldecathlon.com/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094. Patrick Bilic, Patrick Ferdinand Christ, Hongwei Li 0004, Eugene Vorontsov, Avi Ben-Cohen, Georgios Kaissis, Adi Szeskin, Colin Jacobs, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Mamani, Gabriel Chartrand, Fabian Lohöfer, Julian Walter Holch, Wieland H. Sommer, Felix Hofmann, Alexandre Hostettler, Naama Lev-Cohain, Michal Drozdzal, Michal Amitai, Refael Vivanti, Jacob Sosna, Ivan Ezhov, Anjany Sekuboyina, Fernando Navarro, Florian Kofler, Johannes C. Paetzold, Suprosanna Shit, Xiaobin Hu, Jana Lipková, Markus Rempfler, Marie Piraud, Jan Kirschke, Benedikt Wiestler, Christian Hülsemeyer, Marcel Beetz, Florian Ettlinger, Michela Antonelli, Woong Bae, Miriam Bellver, Lei Bi 0001, Hao Chen 0011, Grzegorz Chlebus, Erik Dam, Qi Dou 0001, Chi-Wing Fu, Bogdan Georgescu, Xavier Giró-i-Nieto, Felix Grün, Xu Han 0009, Pheng-Ann Heng, Jürgen Hesser, Jan Hendrik Moltz, Christian Igel, Fabian Isensee, Paul F. Jaeger, Fucang Jia, Krishna Chaitanya Kaluva, Mahendra Khened, Ildoo Kim, Jae-Hun Kim, Sungwoong Kim, Simon Kohl, Tomasz K. Konopczynski, Avinash Kori, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi, Xiaomeng Li 0001, John S. Lowengrub, Jun Ma 0016, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Kevis-Kokitsi Maninis, Hans Meine, Dorit Merhof, Akshay Pai, Mathias Perslev, Jens Petersen, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Xiaojuan Qi 0001, Oliver Rippel, Karsten Roth, Ignacio Sarasua, Andrea Schenk, Zengming Shen, Jordi Torres, Christian Wachinger, Chunliang Wang, Leon Weninger, Daguang Xu, Xiaoping Yang 0001, Simon C. H. Yu, Yading Yuan, Miao Yue, Liping Zhang 0009, Manuel Jorge Cardoso, Spyridon Bakas, Rickmer Braren, Volker Heinemann, Christopher Joseph Pal, An Tang, Samuel Kadoury, Luc Soler, Bram van Ginneken, Hayit Greenspan, Leo Joskowicz, Bjoern Menze |
Medical Image Anal. | 60 |
| 2017 | Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Predominant Instrument Recognition in Polyphonic MusicabstractIdentifying musical instruments in polyphonic music recordings is a challenging but important problem in the field of music information retrieval. It enables music search by instrument, helps recognize musical genres, or can make music transcription easier and more accurate. In this paper, we present a convolutional neural network framework for predominant instrument recognition in real-world polyphonic music. We train our network from fixed-length music excerpts with a single-labeled predominant instrument and estimate an arbitrary number of predominant instruments from an audio signal with a variable length. To obtain the audio-excerpt-wise result, we aggregate multiple outputs from sliding windows over the test audio. In doing so, we investigated two different aggregation methods: one takes the class-wise average followed by normalization, and the other perform temporally local class-wise max-pooling on the output probability prior to averaging and normalization steps to minimize the effect of averaging process suppresses the activation of sporadically appearing instruments. In addition, we conducted extensive experiments on several important factors that affect the performance, including analysis window size, identification threshold, and activation functions for neural networks to find the optimal set of parameters. Our analysis on the instrument-wise performance found that the onset type is a critical factor for recall and precision of each instrument. Using a dataset of 10k audio excerpts from 11 instruments for evaluation, we found that convolutional neural networks are more robust than conventional methods that exploit spectral features and source separation with support vector machines. Experimental results showed that the proposed convolutional network architecture obtained an F1 measure of 0.619 for micro and 0.513 for macro, respectively, achieving 23.1% and 18.8% in performance improvement compared with the state-of-the-art algorithm. Yoonchang Han, Jae-Hun Kim, Kyogu Lee |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 2 |
| 2006 | A Novel Quantitative Validation of the Cortical Surface Reconstruction Algorithm Using MRI Phantom: Issues on Local Geometric Accuracy and Cortical Thickness
Junki Lee, Jae-Hun Kim, Alan C. Evans, Sun I. Kim |
MICCAI (1) | 3 |