Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

François Barthélemy

dblp:24/2181 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 82% Automata and formal languages · 18%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis
0.112007
Using Mazurkiewicz Trace Languages for Partition-Based Morphology · ACL 2007
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
two-level morphology
0.112007
Using Mazurkiewicz Trace Languages for Partition-Based Morphology · ACL 2007
Logic in computer science › concurrency theory
mazurkiewicz traces
0.112007
Using Mazurkiewicz Trace Languages for Partition-Based Morphology · ACL 2007
Logic in computer science › concurrency theory › trace monoids
trace languages
0.112007
Using Mazurkiewicz Trace Languages for Partition-Based Morphology · ACL 2007
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.012001
Guided Parsing of Range Concatenation Languages · ACL 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mazurkiewicz trace languages · 0.1finite-state morphology · 0.1shared derivation forest · 0.1guided parsing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 A Testing Framework for Finite-State Morphology
François Barthélemy
CIAA1
2007 Using Mazurkiewicz Trace Languages for Partition-Based Morphology
François Barthélemy
ACL1
2007 Multi-grain Relations
François Barthélemy
CIAA1
2001 Guided Parsing of Range Concatenation Languages
abstract
The theoretical study of the range concatenation grammar [RCG] formalism has revealed many attractive properties which may be used in NLP. In particular, range concatenation languages [RCL] can be parsed in polynomial time and many classical grammatical formalisms can be translated into equivalent RCGs without increasing their worst-case parsing time complexity. For example, after translation into an equivalent RCG, any tree adjoining grammar can be parsed in O(n6) time. In this paper, we study a parsing technique whose purpose is to improve the practical efficiency of RCL parsers. The non-deterministic parsing choices of the main parser for a language L are directed by a guide which uses the shared derivation forest output by a prior RCL parser for a suitable superset of L. The results of a practical evaluation of this method on a wide coverage English grammar are given.
François Barthélemy, Pierre Boullier, Philippe Deschamp, Éric Villemonte de la Clergerie
ACL1
1998 Information Flow in Tabular Interpretations for Generalized Push-Down Automata
Éric Villemonte de la Clergerie, François Barthélemy
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
1994 A Modular Architecture For Constraint-Based Parsing
François Barthélemy, François Rouaix
COLING1
1994 A Grammatical Approach to DCG Parsing
François Barthélemy
ICLP1